ArticlePediatrics2011
Strategies for addressing barriers to publishing pediatric quality improvement research.
Article in Pediatrics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Barriers and facilitators to disseminating quality improvement and patient safety research: a scoping review.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2025Article
- Healthcare Quality Improvement Competency: A Clinical and Training Imperative for Geropsychology.Journal of clinical psychology in medical settings · 2021Article
- The quest for sustained multiple morbidity reduction in very low-birth-weight infants: the Antifragility project.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2017Observational
- Pediatric screening urinalysis: a difference-in-differences analysis of how a 2007 change in guidelines impacted use.BMC pediatrics · 2014Article
- Perspectives on promoting breastmilk feedings for premature infants during a quality improvement project.Breastfeeding medicine : the official journal of the Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAdvancing the science of quality improvement (QI) requires dissemination of the results of QI. However, the results of few QI interventions reach publication.
objectiveTo identify barriers to publishing results of pediatric QI research and provide practical strategies that QI researchers can use to enhance publishability of their work.
methodsWe reviewed and summarized a workshop conducted at the Pediatric Academic Societies 2007 meeting in Toronto, Ontario, Canada, on conducting and publishing QI research. We also interviewed 7 experts (QI researchers, administrators, journal editors, and health services researchers who have reviewed QI manuscripts) about common reasons that QI research fails to reach publication. We also reviewed recently published pediatric QI articles to find specific examples of tactics to enhance publishability, as identified in interviews and the workshop.
resultsWe found barriers at all stages of the QI process, from identifying an appropriate quality issue to address to drafting the manuscript. Strategies for overcoming these barriers included collaborating with research methodologists, creating incentives to publish, choosing a study design to include a control group, increasing sample size through research networks, and choosing appropriate process and clinical quality measures. Several well-conducted, successfully published QI studies in pediatrics offer guidance to other researchers in implementing these strategies in their own work.
conclusionSpecific, feasible approaches can be used to improve opportunities for publication in pediatric, QI, and general medical journals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.