ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2011
Reconciling global mammal prioritization schemes into a strategy.
Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biogeography of terrestrial vertebrates and its conservation implications in a transitional region in western Mexico.PloS one · 2022Article
- Saving the World's Terrestrial Megafauna.Bioscience · 2016Article
- Historical drivers of extinction risk: using past evidence to direct future monitoring.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2015Article
- Drivers of extinction risk in African mammals: the interplay of distribution state, human pressure, conservation response and species biology.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2014Article
- The key elements of a comprehensive global mammal conservation strategy.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2011Article
- Global patterns of fragmentation and connectivity of mammalian carnivore habitat.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2011Article
- What spatial data do we need to develop global mammal conservation strategies?Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The huge conservation interest that mammals attract and the large datasets that have been collected on them have propelled a diversity of global mammal prioritization schemes, but no comprehensive global mammal conservation strategy. We highlight some of the potential discrepancies between the schemes presented in this theme issue, including: conservation of species or areas, reactive and proactive conservation approaches, conservation knowledge and action, levels of aggregation of indicators of trend and scale issues. We propose that recently collected global mammal data and many of the mammal prioritization schemes now available could be incorporated into a comprehensive global strategy for the conservation of mammals. The task of developing such a strategy should be coordinated by a super-partes, authoritative institution (e.g. the International Union for Conservation of Nature, IUCN). The strategy would facilitate funding agencies, conservation organizations and national institutions to rapidly identify a number of short-term and long-term global conservation priorities, and act complementarily to achieve them.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.