ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2011
Prioritizing conservation investments for mammal species globally.
Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Improving biodiversity protection through artificial intelligence.Nature sustainability · 2022Article
- Connectivity conservation at the crossroads: protected areas versus payments for ecosystem services in conserving connectivity for Colombian carnivores.Royal Society open science · 2022Article
- Dramatic cropland expansion in Myanmar following political reforms threatens biodiversity.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Review
- Factoring attitudes towards armed conflict risk into selection of protected areas for conservation.Nature communications · 2016Article
- Conservation Research Is Not Happening Where It Is Most Needed.PLoS biology · 2016Article
- Article
- Efficient expansion of global protected areas requires simultaneous planning for species and ecosystems.Royal Society open science · 2015Article
- Multi-action planning for threat management: a novel approach for the spatial prioritization of conservation actions.PloS one · 2015Article
- Targeting global conservation funding to limit immediate biodiversity declines.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2013Article
- Cheap and nasty? The potential perils of using management costs to identify global conservation priorities.PloS one · 2013Article
- Future hotspots of terrestrial mammal loss.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2011Article
- Governance factors in the identification of global conservation priorities for mammals.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2011Article
- What spatial data do we need to develop global mammal conservation strategies?Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2011Article
- Reconciling global mammal prioritization schemes into a strategy.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2011Review
- The key elements of a comprehensive global mammal conservation strategy.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We need to set priorities for conservation because we cannot do everything, everywhere, at the same time. We determined priority areas for investment in threat abatement actions, in both a cost-effective and spatially and temporally explicit way, for the threatened mammals of the world. Our analysis presents the first fine-resolution prioritization analysis for mammals at a global scale that accounts for the risk of habitat loss, the actions required to abate this risk, the costs of these actions and the likelihood of investment success. We evaluated the likelihood of success of investments using information on the past frequency and duration of legislative effectiveness at a country scale. The establishment of new protected areas was the action receiving the greatest investment, while restoration was never chosen. The resolution of the analysis and the incorporation of likelihood of success made little difference to this result, but affected the spatial location of these investments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.