Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21843468›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2011

Estimating the synaptic current in a multiconductance AMPA receptor model.

Adi Taflia, David Holcman

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Adi TafliaDepartment of Mathematics, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.
David Holcman
Institut de Biologie de l'École Normale Supérieure · FRTechnion – Israel Institute of Technology · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Synaptic transmission starts after the presynaptic neuron has released diffusing neurotransmitters, leading to postsynaptic receptor activation and a postsynaptic current, mostly mediated by glutamatergic (AMPARs) receptors for excitatory neurons. Despite intense experimental and theoretical research, it is still unclear how factors such as the synaptic cleft geometry, the organization, the number and the multiconductance state of receptors, the geometry of postsynaptic density (PSD), and the neurotransmitter release location, shape the mean and the variance of the postsynaptic current and its plastic changes. To estimate the synaptic current amplitude and to account for the stochastic nature of synaptic transmission, we develop a semianalytical method in which we obtain a general expression for the coefficient of variation. The method uses the experimental data about the multiconductance channels. We find that PSD morphological changes can significantly modulate the synaptic current, which is maximally reliable (the coefficient of variation is minimal) for an optimal size of the PSD, that depends on the vesicular release active zone. We show that this optimal PSD size is due to nonlinear phenomena involving the receptor multibinding cooperativity. We conclude that changes in the PSD geometry can sustain a form of synaptic plasticity, independent of a change in the number of receptors.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalDiffusionIon Channel GatingPost-Synaptic DensityReceptors, AMPASynapsesSynaptic TransmissionReceptors, AMPA

Identifiers

PMID21843468
PMCPMC3175058
OpenAlexW2057168232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.