ArticleBiophysical journal2011
Estimating the synaptic current in a multiconductance AMPA receptor model.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- The First 100 nm Inside the Pre-synaptic Terminal Where Calcium Diffusion Triggers Vesicular Release.Frontiers in synaptic neuroscience · 2018Review
- Neuronal activity controls transsynaptic geometry.Scientific reports · 2016Article
- Synaptic transmission in neurological disorders dissected by a quantitative approach.Communicative & integrative biology · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Synaptic transmission starts after the presynaptic neuron has released diffusing neurotransmitters, leading to postsynaptic receptor activation and a postsynaptic current, mostly mediated by glutamatergic (AMPARs) receptors for excitatory neurons. Despite intense experimental and theoretical research, it is still unclear how factors such as the synaptic cleft geometry, the organization, the number and the multiconductance state of receptors, the geometry of postsynaptic density (PSD), and the neurotransmitter release location, shape the mean and the variance of the postsynaptic current and its plastic changes. To estimate the synaptic current amplitude and to account for the stochastic nature of synaptic transmission, we develop a semianalytical method in which we obtain a general expression for the coefficient of variation. The method uses the experimental data about the multiconductance channels. We find that PSD morphological changes can significantly modulate the synaptic current, which is maximally reliable (the coefficient of variation is minimal) for an optimal size of the PSD, that depends on the vesicular release active zone. We show that this optimal PSD size is due to nonlinear phenomena involving the receptor multibinding cooperativity. We conclude that changes in the PSD geometry can sustain a form of synaptic plasticity, independent of a change in the number of receptors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.