ArticleJournal of health communication2011
Realizing the promise of Web 2.0: engaging community intelligence.
Article in Journal of health communication, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed.
- Experiences and Support Needs of Caregivers of Patients with Higher-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome via Online Bulletin Board in the USA, Canada and UK.Oncology and therapy · 2024Article
- Gathering Structured Patient Insight to Drive the PRO Strategy in COPD: Patient-Centric Drug Development from Theory to Practice.Advances in therapy · 2020Article
- An Adaptive, Contextual, Technology-Aided Support (ACTS) System for Chronic Illness Self-Management.The Milbank quarterly · 2019Article
- Patients' perspectives on COPD: findings from a social media listening study.ERJ open research · 2019Article
- Developing a Peer-to-Peer mHealth Application to Connect Hispanic Cancer Patients.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2017Article
- Online tobacco websites and online communities-who uses them and do users quit smoking? The quit-primo and national dental practice-based research network Hi-Quit studies.Translational behavioral medicine · 2016Article
- Prevailing Opinions on Connected Health in Austria: Results from an Online Survey.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2016Article
- Collective-Intelligence Recommender Systems: Advancing Computer Tailoring for Health Behavior Change Into the 21st Century.Journal of medical Internet research · 2016Review
- Using Social Media While Waiting in Pain: A Clinical 12-Week Longitudinal Pilot Study.JMIR research protocols · 2015Article
- From Big Data to Knowledge in the Social Sciences.The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science · 2015Article
- It takes a (virtual) village: crowdsourcing measurement consensus to advance survivorship care planning.Translational behavioral medicine · 2015Article
- Patient-reported outcomes and therapeutic affordances of social media: findings from a global online survey of people with chronic pain.Journal of medical Internet research · 2015Article
- E-mail to Promote Colorectal Cancer Screening Within Social Networks: Acceptability and Content.Journal of health communication · 2015Article
- High-tech tools for exercise motivation: use and role of technologies such as the internet, mobile applications, social media, and video games.Diabetes spectrum : a publication of the American Diabetes Association · 2015Article
- Behavioral research in cancer prevention and control: a look to the future.American journal of preventive medicine · 2014Review
- Social media use by community-based organizations conducting health promotion: a content analysis.BMC public health · 2013Article
- Content characteristics driving the diffusion of antismoking messages: implications for cancer prevention in the emerging public communication environment.Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs · 2013Article
- Partnering against cancer today: a blueprint for coordinating efforts through communication science.Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs · 2013Article
- Adult Willingness to Use Email and Social Media for Peer-to-Peer Cancer Screening Communication: Quantitative Interview Study.JMIR research protocols · 2013Article
- Implications of Internet availability of genomic information for public health practice.Public health genomics · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Discussions of Health 2.0, a term first coined in 2005, were guided by three main tenets: (a) health was to involve more participation, because an evolution in the web encouraged more direct consumer engagement in their own health care; (b) data was to become the new "Intel Inside" for systems supporting the vital decisions in health; and (c) a sense of collective intelligence from the network would supplement traditional sources of knowledge in health decision making. Interests in understanding the implications of a new paradigm for patient engagement in health and health care were kindled by findings from surveys such as the National Cancer Institute's Health Information National Trends Survey, showing that patients were quick to look online for information to help them cope with disease. This article considers how these 3 facets of Health 2.0--participation, data, and collective intelligence--can be harnessed to improve the health of the nation according to Healthy People 2020 goals. The authors begin with an examination of evidence from behavioral science to understand how Web 2.0 participative technologies may influence patient processes and outcomes, for better or worse, in an era of changing communication technologies. The article then focuses specifically on the clinical implications of Health 2.0 and offers recommendations to ensure that changes in the communication environment do not detract from national (e.g., Healthy People 2020) health goals. Changes in the clinical environment, as catalyzed by the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act to take advantage of Health 2.0 principles in evidence-based ways, are also considered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.