ReviewDialogues in clinical neuroscience2011
Randomized controlled trials in schizophrenia: opportunities, limitations, and trial design alternatives.
Review in Dialogues in clinical neuroscience, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Psychosocial Interventions for Older Adults With Severe Mental Illness: A Systematic Scoping Review and Meta-analysis.Schizophrenia bulletin · 2026Pooled it
- A Meta-analytic Review of Non-specific Effects in Randomized Controlled Trials of Cognitive Remediation for Schizophrenia.The Psychiatric quarterly · 2016Pooled it
- Long-acting injectable vs oral antipsychotics for relapse prevention in schizophrenia: a meta-analysis of randomized trials.Schizophrenia bulletin · 2014Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of individual second-generation vs. first-generation antipsychotics in first-episode psychosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology · 2013Pooled it
- Changing the Antipsychotic in Early Nonimprovers to Amisulpride or Olanzapine: Randomized, Double-Blind Trial in Patients With Schizophrenia.Schizophrenia bulletin · 2022Trial
- Treatment of early non-response in patients with schizophrenia: assessing the efficacy of antipsychotic dose escalation.BMC psychiatry · 2015Trial
- A Scoping Review of Methods, Guidelines, and Protocols Used for Dose Reduction or Discontinuation of Antipsychotic Medication in People Affected by Psychotic Disorders.Schizophrenia bulletin · 2026Article
- Pharmacological management of neurocognitive impairment in schizophrenia: A narrative review.Neuropsychopharmacology reports · 2024Review
- Clinical Outcome Assessment Instruments in Schizophrenia: A Scoping Literature Review with a Focus on the Potential of Patient-reported Outcomes.Innovations in clinical neuroscience · 2023Article
- Effect of long-acting injectable antipsychotics on hospitalizations and global functioning in schizophrenia: a naturalistic mirror-image study.Therapeutic advances in psychopharmacology · 2022Article
- Antipsychotic Polypharmacy for the Management of Schizophrenia: Evidence and Recommendations.Drugs · 2021Review
- Experimental Serotonergic Agents for the Treatment of Schizophrenia.Journal of experimental pharmacology · 2021Review
- Clinical Validity of Subjective Clinical Prognosis in First Episode Psychosis Schizophrenia Patients: An Analysis of Data from the European First Episode Schizophrenia Trial (EUFEST) Study.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2020Article
- Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Long-acting Injectable and Oral Second-generation Antipsychotics for the Treatment of Schizophrenia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Clinical psychopharmacology and neuroscience : the official scientific journal of the Korean College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2018Review
- The acute efficacy of antipsychotics in schizophrenia: a review of recent meta-analyses.Therapeutic advances in psychopharmacology · 2018Review
- What is the risk-benefit ratio of long-term antipsychotic treatment in people with schizophrenia?World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2018Article
- Bridging the Measurement Gap Between Research and Clinical Care in Schizophrenia: Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale-6 (PANSS-6) and Other Assessments Based on the Simplified Negative and Positive Symptoms Interview (SNAPSI).Innovations in clinical neuroscience · 2017Article
- Transdiagnostic Clinical Global Impression Scoring for Routine Clinical Settings.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2017Article
- Role of 3-monthly long-acting injectable paliperidone in the maintenance of schizophrenia.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2017Review
- Trends in the access to and the use of antipsychotic medications and psychotropic co-treatments in Asian patients with schizophrenia.Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
State-of-the art clinical trial design and methodology are enormously important for the advancement of the field. In contrast, the critical relevance of trial conduct and implementation have only more recently been the focus of discussion and research. Although randomized controlled trials are generally considered the gold standard for the assessment of pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic interventions in medicine, trials are vulnerable to complications and influences that can seriously compromise their success. Like interventions, trial design and conduct are also contextual. They need to be individualized and adapted to a number of relevant variables, such as setting, population, illness phase, interventions, patient and rater expectations and biases, and the overall aims of the investigation. While this means that there is no unified approach possible, certain general principles and guidelines require careful consideration. Knowledge of basic solutions and alternatives, and the recognition of the complex challenges that need to be addressed proactively can help to minimize unwanted outcomes, including trial failure and uninformative or falsely negative outcomes. Moreover, novel design alternatives need to be explored that target sample enrichment according to the study question and enhancement of precision in the measurement of relevant outcomes. We propose two novel design strategies that take advantage of the recently validated early antipsychotic response paradigm (that has also been observed with antidepressants and mood stabilizers). In the "early responder randomized discontinuation design" all patients are assigned to the active drug, and only those who had at least a minimal response at 2 weeks are enrolled in a double-blind, placebo-controlled discontinuation trial, enriching the placebo controlled trial portion with true drug responders. In the mirror image "early nonresponder randomized dose increase or augmentation design," early nonresponders at 2 weeks are assigned to staying on the medication or going either to a higher dose or an augmentation agent. It is hoped that through increased attention to the issues raised in this article and further refinement of trial methodology and conduct, the field will make much needed additional progress in the prevention and treatment of schizophrenia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
21842613PMC3182000What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.