ArticleAnnals of dyslexia2013
Genetic and environmental influences on writing and their relations to language and reading.
Article in Annals of dyslexia, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Cross-Study Differences in the Etiology of Reading Comprehension: a Meta-Analytical Review of Twin Studies.Behavior genetics · 2017Pooled it
- Phonological awareness mediates the relationship between DCDC2 and reading performance with home environment.NPJ science of learning · 2024Article
- Cumulative genetic score of KIAA0319 affects reading ability in Chinese children: moderation by parental education and mediation by rapid automatized naming.Behavioral and brain functions : BBF · 2023Article
- Musical instrument engagement in adolescence predicts verbal ability 4 years later: A twin and adoption study.Developmental psychology · 2021Article
- The Mediation Role of Dynamic Multisensory Processing Using Molecular Genetic Data in Dyslexia.Brain sciences · 2020Article
- Understanding Comorbidity Between Specific Learning Disabilities.New directions for child and adolescent development · 2019Review
- Neuropsychology of Learning Disabilities: The Past and the Future.Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society : JINS · 2017Review
- The Effects of Genetic and Environmental Factors on Writing Development.Learning and individual differences · 2017Article
- Predicting vocabulary growth in children with and without specific language impairment: a longitudinal study from 2;6 to 21 years of age.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2015Article
- DeFries-Fulker analysis of longitudinal reading performance data from twin pairs ascertained for reading difficulties and from their nontwin siblings.Behavior genetics · 2011Article
- Evidence-Based Reading and Writing Assessment for Dyslexia in Adolescents and Young Adults.Learning disabilities (Pittsburgh, Pa.)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Identical and fraternal twins (N=540, age 8 to 18 years) were tested on three different measures of writing (Woodcock-Johnson III Tests of Achievement-Writing Samples and Writing Fluency; Handwriting Copy from the Group Diagnostic Reading and Aptitude Achievement Tests), three different language skills (phonological awareness, rapid naming, and vocabulary), and three different reading skills (word recognition, spelling, and reading comprehension). Substantial genetic influence was found on two of the writing measures, writing samples and handwriting copy, and all of the language and reading measures. Shared environment influences were generally not significant, except for Vocabulary. Non-shared environment estimates, including measurement error, were significant for all variables. Genetic influences among the writing measures were significantly correlated (highest between the speeded measures writing fluency and handwriting copy), but there were also significant independent genetic influences between copy and samples and between fluency and samples. Genetic influences on writing were significantly correlated with genetic influences on all of the language and reading skills, but significant independent genetic influences were also found for copy and samples, whose genetic correlations were significantly less than 1.0 with the reading and language skills. The genetic correlations varied significantly in strength depending on the overlap between the writing, language, and reading task demands. We discuss implications of our results for education, limitations of the study, and new directions for research on writing and its relations to language and reading.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.