Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21842250›Full record

ReviewDer Anaesthesist2011

[Cardiac biomarkers in perioperative medicine : significance for noncardiac surgery patients].

A Schlitt, I Reindl, H Ebelt, M Buerke, K Werdan

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Anaesthesist, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

A SchlittKlinik und Poliklinik für Innere Medizin III, Universitätsklinikum, Martin Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Deutschland. axel.schlitt@medizin.uni-halle.de
I Reindl
H Ebelt
M Buerke
K Werdan

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Perioperative detection of cardiac biomarkers may help to identify patients at risk. Whether detection of these markers will be recommended in the preoperative setting for patients with cardiac diseases in the future has to be discussed as large prospective trials on this topic are missing. For preoperative evaluation of cardiac insufficiency quantification of brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) and amino-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) are useful markers. Troponin is the marker of choice for detection of myocardial ischemia/infarction in the postoperative setting. In unstable patients coronary angiography and/or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are indicated. However, in stable patients the decision for coronary angiography and/or PCI has to be made in each patient individually after interdisciplinary discussion between anesthesiologists, cardiologists and surgeons.

Indexed as

Perioperative CareSurgical Procedures, OperativeBiomarkersCoronary AngiographyC-Reactive ProteinHeartHeart Function TestsHumansMyocardial InfarctionMyocardial IschemiaNatriuretic Peptide, BrainPeptide FragmentsRisk AssessmentTroponinBiomarkersC-Reactive ProteinNatriuretic Peptide, BrainPeptide Fragmentspro-brain natriuretic peptide (1-76)Troponin

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.