Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21840986›Full record

ArticleCancer research2011

Comparison of increased aromatase versus ERα in the generation of mammary hyperplasia and cancer.

Edgar S Díaz-Cruz, Yasuro Sugimoto, G Ian Gallicano, Robert W Brueggemeier, Priscilla A Furth

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer research, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Initial Studies withJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2020
    Article
  11. A novel and cost-effectiveBiology open · 2020
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. p53 as a Regulator of Lipid Metabolism in Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2016
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Edgar S Díaz-CruzDepartments of Oncology, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.esd24@georgetown.edu
Yasuro Sugimoto
G Ian Gallicano
Robert W Brueggemeier
Priscilla A Furth
Georgetown University · USThe Ohio State University · US

Funding

TRAINING GRANT IN TUMOR BIOLOGYT32CA009686 · NCI · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI ANNA Tate RIEGEL, DAVID J ROBBINS · 1996 to 2026
$10.8M
Progression and regression of mammary preneoplasiaR01CA112176 · NCI · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI FURTH, PRISCILLA A. · 2005 to 2018
$3.1M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA112176NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009686
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Factors associated with increased estrogen synthesis increase breast cancer risk. Increased aromatase and estrogen receptor α (ERα) in both normal epithelium and ductal carcinoma in situ lesions are found in conjunction with breast cancer, leading to the idea that altered estrogen signaling pathways predispose the mammary gland to cancer development. Here, we developed a transgenic mouse that conditionally expresses aromatase in the mammary gland, and used it along with a deregulated ERα expression model to investigate the molecular pathways involved in the development of mammary gland preneoplasia and carcinoma. Both increased ERα and aromatase expression led to the development of preneoplasia, but increased preneoplasia, in addition to carcinoma, was found in aromatase overexpressing mice. Increased prevalence of mammary pathologic changes in mice expressing aromatase correlated with increased cyclin E and cyclin-dependent kinase 2 expression. Gain of both ERα and aromatase increased expression of ERα and progesterone receptor, but aromatase produced a higher increase than ERα, accompanied by higher levels of downstream target genes Ccnd1, Myc, and Tnfsf11. In summary, whereas gain of both ERα and aromatase activate abnormal growth pathways in the mammary gland, aromatase induced a wider range of abnormalities that was associated with a higher prevalence of mammary preneoplasia and cancer progression.

Indexed as

AnimalsAromataseBase SequenceDNA PrimersEstrogen Receptor alphaFemaleHyperplasiaMammary Neoplasms, ExperimentalMiceMice, TransgenicPhosphorylationPrecancerous ConditionsAromataseDNA PrimersEstrogen Receptor alpha

Identifiers

PMID21840986
PMCPMC3405850
OpenAlexW2138638290

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.