Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21840893›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of public health2012

Usefulness of a single-item measure of depression to predict mortality: the GAZEL prospective cohort study.

Thomas Lefèvre, Archana Singh-Manoux, Silvia Stringhini, Aline Dugravot, Cédric Lemogne, Silla M Consoli, Marcel Goldberg, Marie Zins, Hermann Nabi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of public health, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Evaluating How Mental Health Changed in Australia through the COVID-19 Pandemic: Findings from the 'International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Are Single-Item Global Ratings Useful for Assessing Health Status?Journal of clinical psychology in medical settings · 2015
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Thomas LefèvreINSERM, U1018, Centre for research in Epidemiology and Population Health, Epidemiology of occupational and social determinants of health, F-94807, Villejuif, France.
Archana Singh-Manoux
Silvia Stringhini
Aline Dugravot
Cédric Lemogne
Silla M Consoli
Marcel Goldberg
Marie Zins
Hermann Nabi

Funding

Socio-economic status and heterogeneity in agingR01AG013196 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF LONDON INST OF NEUROLOGY · PI MARMOT, MICHAEL G, SINGH-MANOUX, ARCHANA · 1996 to 2013
$3.5M
Health behaviors over the adult lifecourse and cognitive agingR01AG034454 · NIA · UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON · PI KIVIMAKI, MIKA J, SINGH-MANOUX, ARCHANA · 2009 to 2013
$1.5M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG013196NIA NIH HHS R01AG013196NIA NIH HHS R01 AG034454NIA NIH HHS R01AG034454
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIt remains unknown whether short measures of depression perform as well as long measures in predicting adverse outcomes such as mortality. The present study aims to examine the predictive value of a single-item measure of depression for mortality.

methodsA total of 14,185 participants of the GAZEL cohort completed the 20-item Center-for-Epidemiologic-Studies-Depression (CES-D) scale in 1996. One of these items (I felt depressed) was used as a single-item measure of depression. All-cause mortality data were available until 30 September 2009, a mean follow-up period of 12.7 years with a total of 650 deaths.

resultsIn Cox regression model adjusted for baseline socio-demographic characteristics, a one-unit increase in the single-item score (range 0-3) was associated with a 25% higher risk of all-cause mortality (95% CI: 13-37%, P<0.001). Further adjustment for health-related behaviours and physical chronic diseases reduced this risk by 36% and 8%, respectively. After adjustment for all these variables, every one-unit increase in the single-item score predicted a 15% increased risk of death (95% CI: 5-27%, P<0.01). There is also an evidence of a dose-reponse relationship between reponse scores on the single-item measure of depression and mortality.

conclusionThis study shows that a single-item measure of depression is associated with an increased risk of death. Given its simplicity and ease of administration, a very simple single-item measure of depression might be useful for identifying middle-aged adults at risk for elevated depressive symptoms in large epidemiological studies and clinical settings.

Indexed as

Cause of DeathAdultDepressionFemaleFollow-Up StudiesFranceHealth BehaviorHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsProportional Hazards ModelsProspective StudiesPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesRisk FactorsSocioeconomic Factors

Identifiers

PMID21840893
PMCPMC3457003

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.