Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21839853›Full record

ReviewMicrobes and infection2011

Innate immune responses to Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection.

Elise G Lavoie, Tamding Wangdi, Barbara I Kazmierczak

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Microbes and infection, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 119 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
119citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

119 citing papers in PubMed, 233 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Synergy betweenMolecular therapy. Methods & clinical development · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Modeling Host-Pathogen Interactions inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

59 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Elise G LavoieDepartment of Internal Medicine (Infectious Diseases), Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520-8022, USA.
Tamding Wangdi
Barbara I Kazmierczak
Yale University · US

Funding

Innate Immune Responses to Type 3 Secretion System Components and EffectorsR01AI081825 · NIAID · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI KAZMIERCZAK, BARBARA I · 2010 to 2013
$1.7M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI081825NIAID NIH HHS R01AI081825
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Innate immune responses play a critical role in controlling acute infections due to Pseudomonas aeruginosa in both mice and in humans. In this review we focus on innate immune recognition and clearance mechanisms that are important for controlling P. aeruginosa in the mammalian lung, with particular attention to those that influence the outcome of in vivo infection in murine models.

Indexed as

Immunity, InnateAnimalsBacterial ProteinsComplement System ProteinsCytokinesDendritic CellsHumansInflammasomesLipopolysaccharidesLungLymphocytesMacrophages, AlveolarMiceMice, KnockoutNeutrophilsPneumoniaBacterial ProteinsComplement System ProteinsCytokinesInflammasomesLipopolysaccharidesReceptors, Pattern Recognition

Identifiers

PMID21839853
PMCPMC3221798
OpenAlexW1981764881

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.