Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21839145›Full record

ArticleNeuroscience letters2011

Induction of pluripotent stem cells from autopsy donor-derived somatic cells.

Brooke E Hjelm, Jon B Rosenberg, Szabolcs Szelinger, Lucia I Sue, Thomas G Beach, Matthew J Huentelman, David W Craig

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroscience letters, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Arizona Study of Aging and Neurodegenerative Disorders and Brain and Body Donation Program.Neuropathology : official journal of the Japanese Society of Neuropathology · 2015
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Brooke E HjelmNeurogenomics Division, The Translational Genomics Research Institute (TGen), Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Jon B Rosenberg
Szabolcs Szelinger
Lucia I Sue
Thomas G Beach
Matthew J Huentelman
David W Craig
Translational Genomics Research Institute · USAlzheimer's Association · USArizona Alzheimer’s ConsortiumArizona State University · US

Funding

Research Education ComponentP30AG019610 · NIA · SUN HEALTH RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI GONZALEZ HERNANDEZ, GRACIELA · 2001 to 2020
$32.5M
Microarray Center for Research on the Nervous SystemU24NS051872 · NINDS · TRANSLATIONAL GENOMICS RESEARCH INST · PI CRAIG, DAVID W · 2005 to 2009
$7.2M
APOEomic: Searching for APOE interacting risk factors using omics dataR01AG041232 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI HUENTELMAN, MATT, MYERS, AMANDA J · 2013 to 2017
$1.7M
Genetic Variation in KIBRA and its role in Human Episodic MemoryR01NS059873 · NINDS · TRANSLATIONAL GENOMICS RESEARCH INST · PI HUENTELMAN, MATT · 2008 to 2011
$1.4M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG019610NIA NIH HHS P30 AG19610NIA NIH HHS R01 AG041232NINDS NIH HHS 5U24NS051872-05NINDS NIH HHS R01NS05987NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS059873NINDS NIH HHS U24 NS051872
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) have become an intriguing approach for neurological disease modeling, because neural lineage-specific cell types that retain the donors' complex genetics can be established in vitro. The statistical power of these iPSC-based models, however, is dependent on accurate diagnoses of the somatic cell donors; unfortunately, many neurodegenerative diseases are commonly misdiagnosed in live human subjects. Postmortem histopathological examination of a donor's brain, combined with premortem clinical criteria, is often the most robust approach to correctly classify an individual as a disease-specific case or unaffected control. In this study, we describe iPSCs generated from a skin biopsy collected postmortem during the rapid autopsy of a 75-year-old male, whole body donor, defined as an unaffected neurological control by both clinical and histopathological criteria. These iPSCs were established in a feeder-free system by lentiviral transduction of the Yamanaka factors, Oct3/4, Sox2, Klf4, and c-Myc. Selected iPSC clones expressed both nuclear and surface antigens recognized as pluripotency markers of human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) and were able to differentiate in vitro into neurons and glia. Statistical analysis also demonstrated that fibroblast proliferation was significantly affected by biopsy site, but not donor age (within an elderly cohort). These results provide evidence that autopsy donor-derived fibroblasts can be successfully reprogrammed into iPSCs, and may provide an advantageous approach for generating iPSC-based neurological disease models.

Indexed as

AgedAutopsyCell Culture TechniquesCell DedifferentiationCell LineageFibroblastsHumansInduced Pluripotent Stem CellsKruppel-Like Factor 4MalePrimary Cell CultureTissue DonorsTransduction, GeneticKruppel-Like Factor 4

Identifiers

PMID21839145
PMCPMC3195418
OpenAlexW1976984241

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.