Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21838837›Full record

ArticleThe American journal on addictions

Improving temporal efficiency of outpatient buprenorphine induction.

Erik W Gunderson, Frances R Levin, Margaret M Rombone, Suzanne K Vosburg, Herbert D Kleber

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal on addictions. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. The dynamic interaction between pain and opioid misuse.British journal of pharmacology · 2018
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Erik W GundersonDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurobehavioral Sciences and Department of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USA. erikgunderson@virginia.edu
Frances R Levin
Margaret M Rombone
Suzanne K Vosburg
Herbert D Kleber
National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse at Columbia University · USNew York State Psychiatric Institute

Funding

Improving Drug Abuse Treatment by Research and TrainingK05DA014284 · NIDA · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI KLEBER, HERBERT DAVID · 2001 to 2010
$1.2M
TREATMENT OF SUBSTANCE ABUSE AND PSYCHIATRIC COMORBIDITYK02DA000465 · NIDA · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI LEVIN, FRANCES RUDNICK · 2000 to 2009
$1.2M
Buprenorphine for Opioid Dependence in Primary CareK23DA020000 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI GUNDERSON, ERIK W · 2005 to 2009
$884k
NIDA NIH HHS K02 DA000465NIDA NIH HHS K02 DA00465NIDA NIH HHS K05 DA014284NIDA NIH HHS K05 DA14284NIDA NIH HHS K23 DA02000NIDA NIH HHS K23 DA020000NIDA NIH HHS L30 DA018521
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Buprenorphine induction poses a barrier for physician adoption of office-based opioid dependence treatment. We conducted a retrospective chart review of the first 41 patients inducted at a newly established outpatient treatment program to examine the induction process and determine strategies associated with greater induction efficiency. Timed withdrawal scales, medication log, and notes enabled reconstruction of the initial day of buprenorphine treatment. To assess change with experience, consecutive patients were divided into three chronological groups for analyses (Phases 1-3). The time required for induction was substantial in Phase 1 (mean 5.5 hours), but temporal efficiency improved to a mean 1.5 hours spent at the program by Phase 3 (p < .001). Phase 2-3 patients arrived to the program after significantly longer opioid abstinence and were in greater withdrawal, with mean Clinical Opioid Withdrawal Scale scores of 6, 10, and 10 for Phases 1-3, respectively (p < .01). Patients in the later phases had less time delay to medication initiation, 5 minutes in Phase 3 compared to 133 minutes in Phase 1 (p < .001). The mean 7-mg buprenorphine dose administered in the office did not differ between groups, but occurred over a smaller time interval for later phases indicating more rapid titration. Patients in the later phases had more rapid withdrawal relief after buprenorphine initiation and were more likely to have used preinduction ancillary withdrawal medication. The study sheds light on the induction barrier and provides practical procedural information to inform clinical guidelines and hopefully mitigate procedural aspects of the induction barrier.

Indexed as

AdultBuprenorphineFemaleGeneral PracticeHumansMaleNarcotic AntagonistsOpiate Substitution TreatmentOpioid-Related DisordersRetrospective StudiesSubstance Withdrawal SyndromeTime FactorsBuprenorphineNarcotic Antagonists

Identifiers

PMID21838837
PMCPMC3156625
OpenAlexW1919755946

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.