Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21838788›Full record

Trial reportBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2012

Dosing algorithm to target a predefined AUC in patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma receiving high dose methotrexate.

Markus Joerger, Andrés J M Ferreri, Stephan Krähenbühl, Jan H M Schellens, Thomas Cerny, Emanuele Zucca, Alwin D R Huitema

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Primary CNS lymphoma.Current hematologic malignancy reports · 2014
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Markus JoergerDepartment of Oncology and Hematology, Cantonal Hospital, Rorschacherstrasse 95, 9007 St Gallen, Switzerland. markus.joerger@kssg.ch
Andrés J M Ferreri
Stephan Krähenbühl
Jan H M Schellens
Thomas Cerny
Emanuele Zucca
Alwin D R Huitema

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThere is no consensus regarding optimal dosing of high dose methotrexate (HDMTX) in patients with primary CNS lymphoma. Our aim was to develop a convenient dosing algorithm to target AUC(MTX) in the range between 1000 and 1100 µmol l(-1) h.

methodsA population covariate model from a pooled dataset of 131 patients receiving HDMTX was used to simulate concentration-time curves of 10,000 patients and test the efficacy of a dosing algorithm based on 24 h MTX plasma concentrations to target the prespecified AUC(MTX) . These data simulations included interindividual, interoccasion and residual unidentified variability. Patients received a total of four simulated cycles of HDMTX and adjusted MTX dosages were given for cycles two to four.

resultsThe dosing algorithm proposes MTX dose adaptations ranging from +75% in patients with MTX C(24) < 0.5 µmol l(-1) up to -35% in patients with MTX C(24) > 12 µmol l(-1). The proposed dosing algorithm resulted in a marked improvement of the proportion of patients within the AUC(MTX) target between 1000 and 1100 µmol l(-1) h (11% with standard MTX dose, 35% with the adjusted dose) and a marked reduction of the interindividual variability of MTX exposure.

conclusionsA simple and practical dosing algorithm for HDMTX has been developed based on MTX 24 h plasma concentrations, and its potential efficacy in improving the proportion of patients within a prespecified target AUC(MTX) and reducing the interindividual variability of MTX exposure has been shown by data simulations. The clinical benefit of this dosing algorithm should be assessed in patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL).

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAntimetabolites, AntineoplasticArea Under CurveBayes TheoremBrain NeoplasmsDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleHumansLymphomaMaleMetabolic Clearance RateMethotrexateTreatment OutcomeAntimetabolites, AntineoplasticMethotrexate

Identifiers

PMID21838788
PMCPMC3269583

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.