ArticleMicrobial ecology2012
A multiphasic approach for the identification of endophytic bacterial in strawberry fruit and their potential for plant growth promotion.
Article in Microbial ecology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
40 citing papers in PubMed.
- Antioxidant properties of bioactive metabolites produced by lactic acid bacteria isolated from tropical fruits.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2026Article
- Bioactivity and metabolic profiling of crude extracts from endophytic bacteria linked toHeliyon · 2025Article
- Plant endophytes: unveiling hidden applications toward agro-environment sustainability.Folia microbiologica · 2024Review
- Exploring the diversity and potential functional characteristics of microbiota associated with different compartments ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2024Article
- Effect of aFrontiers in plant science · 2024Article
- Draft genome sequencing of halotolerant bacterium3 Biotech · 2023Article
- New Insights in the Detection and Management of Anthracnose Diseases in Strawberries.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Sustainable Applications of Endophytic Bacteria and Their Physiological/Biochemical Roles on Medicinal and Herbal Plants: Review.Microorganisms · 2023Review
- Replacement of water yam (Frontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
- Microbial Intervention: An Approach to Combat the Postharvest Pathogens of Fruits.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- The Friend Within: Endophytic Bacteria as a Tool for Sustainability in Strawberry Crops.Microorganisms · 2022Article
- Review
- The Multifunctions and Future Prospects of Endophytes and Their Metabolites in Plant Disease Management.Microorganisms · 2022Review
- Article
- Enumeration of citrus endophytic bacterial communities based on illumine metagenomics technique.PloS one · 2022Article
- Article
- Diversity and Taxonomic Distribution of Endophytic Bacterial Community in the Rice Plant and Its Prospective.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Harnessing Bacterial Endophytes for Promotion of Plant Growth and Biotechnological Applications: An Overview.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- The Antibacterial Activity of Crude Extracts of Secondary Metabolites from Bacterial Endophytes Associated withInternational journal of microbiology · 2021Article
- The chitinolytic activity of the Curtobacterium sp. isolated from field-grown soybean and analysis of its genome sequence.PloS one · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study used a multiphasic approach, characterized by the simultaneous use of culture-dependent and culture-independent methods, to investigate endophytic bacterial communities in strawberry (Fragaria ananassa) fruit. A total of 92 bacterial endophytes were isolated and initially grouped by their repetitive extragenic palindromic (rep)-PCR banding pattern and biochemical features. Phylogenetic analysis of the 16S rRNA gene sequences of 45 representatives showed that the isolates belonged to the species Bacillus subtilis (eight isolates), Bacillus sp. (seven isolates), Enterobacter sp. (seven isolates), Enterobacter ludwigii (six isolates), Lactobacillus plantarum (six isolates), Pseudomonas sp. (five isolates), Pantoea punctata (three isolates), and Curtobacterium citreum (three isolates). Nucleic acids were extracted from the strawberry fruit and subjected to 16S rRNA gene directed polymerase chain reaction denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (16S rRNA PCR-DGGE). The species B. subtilis, Enterobacter sp., and Pseudomonas sp. were detected both by isolation and DGGE. The DGGE fingerprints of total bacterial DNA did not exhibit bands corresponding to several of the representative species isolated in the extinction dilution (L. plantarum, C. citreum, and P. punctata). In contrast, bands in the DGGE profile that were identified as relatives of Arthrobacter sp. and one uncultivable Erythrobacter sp. were not recovered by cultivation techniques. After isolation, the nitrogen fixation ability and the in vitro production of indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) equivalents and siderophores were evaluated. A high percentage of isolates were found to possess the ability to produce siderophores and IAA equivalents; however, only a few isolates belonging to the genera Pseudomonas and Enterobacter showed the ability to fix nitrogen. Plant growth promotion was evaluated under greenhouse conditions and revealed the ability of the Bacillus strains to enhance the number of leaves, shoot length, root dry weight, and shoot dry weight. The activity of the bacterial isolate identified as B. subtilis NA-108 exerted the greatest influence on strawberry growth and showed a 42.8% increase in number of leaves, 15.26% for high shoot, 43.5% increase in root dry weight, and a 77% increase in shoot dry weight when compared with untreated controls.
Indexed as
Identifiers
21837472What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.