Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21836812›Full record

ReviewInfectious diseases in obstetrics and gynecology2011

Screening for cytomegalovirus during pregnancy.

Stuart P Adler

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Infectious diseases in obstetrics and gynecology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Frequency of CMV testing during pregnancy-a retrospective study.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Overview of Human Cytomegalovirus Pathogenesis.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Testing for Cytomegalovirus in Pregnancy.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2017
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Stuart P AdlerMedical College of Virginia Campus, Virginia Commonwealth University, P.O. Box 980163, Richmond, VA 23298-0163, USA. Sadler@vcu.edu

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The epidemiology and pathogenesis of CMV infections among pregnant women have been intensely studied over the last three decades. This paper highlights recent developments that make either universal or limited serologic screening for CMV during pregnancy potentially attractive. The developments include an understanding of the pathogenesis of CMV infections, a knowledge of high-risk women, the availability of accurate methods for the serologic diagnosis of a primary CMV infection using either single or serial blood samples, accurate methods for the diagnosis of fetal infection via amniotic fluid, sensitive fetal and placental indicators for neonatal outcomes, and the availability of potentially effective interventions.

Indexed as

CytomegalovirusCytomegalovirus InfectionsFemaleHumansPregnancyPregnancy Complications, InfectiousPrenatal Diagnosis

Identifiers

PMID21836812
PMCPMC3152970

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.