ArticleBehavioural pharmacology2011
Characterization of the antinociceptive effects of the individual isomers of methadone after acute and chronic administrations.
Article in Behavioural pharmacology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Reply to "Letter to the Editor regarding 'Unique pharmacodynamic properties and low abuse liability of the μ-opioid receptor ligand (S)-methadone'".Molecular psychiatry · 2025Article
- Concurrent Assessment of the Antinociceptive and Behaviorally Disruptive Effects of Opioids in Squirrel Monkeys.The journal of pain · 2018Article
- Co-morbid pain and opioid addiction: long term effect of opioid maintenance on acute pain.Drug and alcohol dependence · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Methadone is a long-acting opioid used in the treatment of various pain states and substitution therapy in heroin addiction. Extensive behavioral characterization has been carried out using the racemate, but limited investigation has been performed with the individual isomers. The L-isomer is a potent opioid agonist, whereas the D-isomer has weak µ-opioid activity and has also been shown to possess N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonist properties in vitro. The acute antinociceptive effects of the isomers were evaluated in rats using a warm-water, tail-withdrawal procedure at two stimulus intensities (50° and 55°C). Increasing dose ratios of D-methadone to L-methadone were administered chronically to determine the ability of the D-isomer to modulate antinociceptive tolerance to the L-isomer. Acutely, both L-methadone (0.1-5.6 mg/kg, subcutaneously) and D-methadone (3.0-56.0 mg/kg, subcutaneously) produced antinociception, although the efficacy of the D-isomer was limited at 55°C. These effects were dose dependently blocked by naltrexone (0.01-1.0 mg/kg, subcutaneously). Administered chronically, D-methadone (1.7-10 mg/kg, subcutaneously) dose dependently blocked tolerance development to the L-isomer (1.7 mg/kg, subcutaneously). These findings support the antinociceptive effects of the isomers being opioid receptor mediated with the L-isomer functioning as a full-efficacy agonist, whereas the D-isomer seems to have lower efficacy. The ability of nonracemic doses of the D-isomer to prevent tolerance development to the L-isomer may be attributed to partial µ-agonist activity; however, N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonist activity cannot be discounted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.