Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21836462›Full record

ArticleBehavioural pharmacology2011

Discriminative stimulus effects of NMDA, AMPA, and mGluR5 glutamate receptor ligands in methamphetamine-trained rats.

Thomas E Wooters, Linda P Dwoskin, Michael T Bardo

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioural pharmacology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 46% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Thomas E WootersDepartment of Psychology, College of Arts and Sciences, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky 40536, USA.
Linda P Dwoskin
Michael T Bardo
University of Kentucky · US

Funding

Development of Novel Therapies or Methamphetamine AbuseR01DA013519 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI DWOSKIN, LINDA P · 2000 to 2009
$5.1M
Development of Novel Therapies or Methamphetamine AbuseU01DA013519 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI DWOSKIN, LINDA P · 2012 to 2016
$3.2M
RESEARCH TRAINING IN DRUG ABUSE BEHAVIORT32DA007304 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI RUSH, CRAIG R · 1998 to 2012
$3.1M
Reinforcing and neurochemical effects of cocaine in a rodent model of ADHDF31DA023853 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI WOOTERS, THOMAS E · 2008 to 2009
$59k
NIDA NIH HHS DA013519NIDA NIH HHS F31 DA023853NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA013519NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA007304NIDA NIH HHS U01 DA013519
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glutamate contributes to the reinforcing and stimulant effects of methamphetamine, yet its potential role in the interoceptive stimulus properties of methamphetamine is unknown. In this study, adult male Sprague-Dawley rats were trained to discriminate methamphetamine [1.0 mg/kg, intraperitoneally] from saline in a standard operant discrimination task. The effects of methamphetamine (0.1-1.0 mg/kg, intraperitoneally); N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor channel blockers, MK-801 (0.03-0.3 mg/kg, intraperitoneally) and ketamine (1.0-10.0 mg/kg, intraperitoneally); polyamine site NMDA receptor antagonist, ifenprodil (1-10 mg/kg); α-amino-3-hydroxyl-5-methyl-4-isoxazole-propionate receptor antagonist, 6-cyano-7-nitroquinoxaline-2,3-dione (1-10 mg/kg, intraperitoneally); and metabotropic 5 glutamate receptor antagonist, 6-methyl-2-(phenylethynyl)pyridine (1-10 mg/kg), given alone were determined in substitution tests. The effects of MK-801 (0.03 and 0.1 mg/kg), ketamine (1.0 and 3.0 mg/kg), ifenprodil (5.6 mg/kg), 6-cyano-7-nitroquinoxaline-2,3-dione (5.6 mg/kg), and 6-methyl-2-(phenylethynyl)pyridine (5.6 mg/kg) were also tested in combination with methamphetamine to assess for alterations in the methamphetamine cue. In substitution tests, none of the test drugs generalized to the methamphetamine cue. However, ketamine and ifenprodil produced significant leftward shifts in the methamphetamine dose-response curve. In addition, the potention by MK-801 nearly attained significance. These results suggest that blockade of the NMDA receptor augments the interoceptive stimulus properties of methamphetamine.

Indexed as

AnimalsConditioning, OperantDiscrimination LearningDose-Response Relationship, DrugExcitatory Amino Acid AntagonistsInjections, IntraperitonealLigandsMaleMethamphetamineRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyReceptor, Metabotropic Glutamate 5Receptors, AMPAReceptors, Metabotropic GlutamateReceptors, N-Methyl-D-AspartateExcitatory Amino Acid AntagonistsGrm5 protein, ratLigandsMethamphetamineReceptor, Metabotropic Glutamate 5Receptors, AMPAReceptors, Metabotropic GlutamateReceptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate

Identifiers

PMID21836462
PMCPMC3354914
OpenAlexW2085413759

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.