ReviewAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2012
The new World Health Organization Classification of Central Nervous System Tumors: what can the neuroradiologist really say?
Review in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pineal Gland Tumor Microenvironment.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2020Review
- Freiburg Neuropathology Case Conference : Hypersalivatory Seizures in a 6-year-old Child.Clinical neuroradiology · 2019Article
- Choroid plexus tumours on MRI: similarities and distinctions in different grades.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2019Article
- Magnetic resonance imaging of pineal tumors and drop metastases: a review approach.Rare tumors · 2017Article
- SRL-Coated PAMAM Dendrimer Nano-Carrier for Targeted Gene Delivery to the Glioma Cells and Competitive Inhibition by Lactoferrin.Iranian journal of pharmaceutical research : IJPR · 2016Article
- Are we over treating Pineal Parenchymal tumour with intermediate differentiation? Assessing the role of localised radiation therapy and literature review.SpringerPlus · 2016Article
- High accuracy of arterial spin labeling perfusion imaging in differentiation of pilomyxoid from pilocytic astrocytoma.Neuroradiology · 2015Article
- Angiocentric glioma, a recently added WHO grade-I tumor.Radiology case reports · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The WHO Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System has become the worldwide standard for classifying and grading brain neoplasms. The most recent edition (WHO 2007) introduced a number of significant changes that include both additions and redefinitions or clarifications of existing entities. Eight new neoplasms and 4 new variants were introduced. This article reviews these entities, summarizing both their histology and imaging appearance. Now with more than 3 years of clinical experience following publication of the newest revision, we also ask, "What can the neuroradiologist really say?" Are there imaging findings that could suggest the preoperative diagnosis of a new tumor entity or variant?
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.