Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21835895›Full record

SynthesisThe oncologist2011

Prognostic role of vitamin d status and efficacy of vitamin D supplementation in cancer patients: a systematic review.

Consuelo Buttigliero, Chiara Monagheddu, Paola Petroni, Andrea Saini, Luigi Dogliotti, Giovannino Ciccone, Alfredo Berruti

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The oncologist, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03210441 (Evaluation of Eating Habits and Dysgeusia During Chemotherapy Treatment), which is not on this map. Cited by 40 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03210441 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2014, after this paper: background citation

Evaluation of Eating Habits and Dysgeusia During Chemotherapy Treatment: a Prospective Cohort Study on Patients Affected by Breast Cancer

TypeobservationalSponsorAzienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale degli Spedali Civili di BresciaRan2014 to 2018Enrolled204ConditionsBreast Cancer, Dysgeusia, Eating Behavior, Quality of Life
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 98 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Association between serum Vitamin D levels and prognostic factors in nonmetastatic breast cancer patients.Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · 2022
    Article
  18. 25-Hydroxy vitamin D deficiency predicts inferior prognosis in mantle cell lymphoma.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2020
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Consuelo ButtiglieroOncologia Medica, Ospedale San Luigi, Regione Gonzole 10, 10043 Orbassano, Italy.
Chiara Monagheddu
Paola Petroni
Andrea Saini
Luigi Dogliotti
Giovannino Ciccone
Alfredo Berruti
Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria San Giovanni Battista · ITOspedale San Luigi Gonzaga · ITUniversity of Turin · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhether or not hypovitaminosis D can influence the prognosis of cancer patients and whether or not vitamin D (vitD) supplementation improves outcome remain controversial.

designStudies evaluating the prognostic role of vitD and vitD receptor (VDR) in cancer patients and trials evaluating the efficacy of vitD administration on patient outcome were identified by a search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, ISI Web of Knowledge, and the Cochrane Library through June 2010.

resultsTwenty-five studies were included. A negative prognostic role for low serum vitD level was observed in five cohort studies including patients with breast cancer (one study), colon cancer (two studies), prostate cancer (one study), and melanoma (one study), but not in two studies on non-small cell lung cancer and one study on breast cancer. Three of four studies showed that VDR(+) tumors carry a better prognosis than VDR(-) tumors, whereas VDR polymorphisms were significantly associated with prognosis in five of 10 studies. A significant interaction between serum vitD level and VDR polymorphism was observed in one study. Three randomized trials involving advanced prostate cancer patients explored the prognostic role of vitD supplementation. A meta-analysis of these trials showed no effect on survival (pooled risk ratio, 1.07; 95% confidence interval, CI, 0.93-1.23), with strong heterogeneity among studies.

conclusionHypovitaminosis D seems to be associated with a worse prognosis in some cancers, but vitD supplementation failed to demonstrate a benefit in prostate cancer patients. The currently available evidence is insufficient to recommend vitD supplementation in cancer patients in clinical practice.

Indexed as

Dietary SupplementsFemaleHumansMaleNeoplasmsPrognosisProspective StudiesVitamin DVitamin D

Identifiers

PMID21835895
PMCPMC3228169
OpenAlexW2170390325

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.