Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21835338›Full record

ReviewNeuron2011

Regulated reprogramming in the regeneration of sensory receptor cells.

Olivia Bermingham-McDonogh, Thomas A Reh

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neuron, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 99 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Repair of surviving hair cells in the damaged mouse utricle.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Epigenetics in neuronal regeneration.Seminars in cell & developmental biology · 2020
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Olivia Bermingham-McDonoghDepartment of Biological Structure, Institute for Stem Cells and Regenerative Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA. oliviab@uw.edu
Thomas A Reh
California Institute for Regenerative Medicine · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

Self Renewal and Differentiation of Human Embryonic Stem CellsP01GM081619 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI REH, THOMAS A · 2007 to 2017
$20.6M
Supplement to EY021482 to carry out a screen for retinal regeneration using CRISPR-Cas9 gene activation.R01EY021482 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI THOMAS A REH · 2011 to 2026
$6.3M
Regeneration of Retinal Neurons by Chemically Induced Reprogramming of Muller GliR01EY021374 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI DING, SHENG, REH, THOMAS A · 2010 to 2014
$4.2M
Regulation of sensory cell specification in the developing cochleaR01DC009991 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI BERMINGHAM-MCDONOGH, OLIVIA MARY · 2010 to 2014
$1.7M
FGF in Sensory System DevelopmentR01DC005953 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI BERMINGHAM-MCDONOGH, OLIVIA MARY · 2004 to 2010
$1.6M
Regeneration in the vestibular systemR21DC010862 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI BERMINGHAM-MCDONOGH, OLIVIA MARY · 2010 to 2011
$449k
NEI NIH HHS EY021374NEI NIH HHS EY021482NEI NIH HHS R01 EY021374NEI NIH HHS R01 EY021482NIDCD NIH HHS DC005953NIDCD NIH HHS DC009991NIDCD NIH HHS DC010862NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC005953NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC009991NIDCD NIH HHS R21 DC010862NIGMS NIH HHS P01 GM081619NIGMS NIH HHS P01 GM081619-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vision, olfaction, hearing, and balance are mediated by receptors that reside in specialized sensory epithelial organs. Age-related degeneration of the photoreceptors in the retina and the hair cells in the cochlea, caused by macular degeneration and sensorineural hearing loss, respectively, affect a growing number of individuals. Although sensory receptor cells in the mammalian retina and inner ear show only limited or no regeneration, in many nonmammalian vertebrates, these sensory epithelia show remarkable regenerative potential. We summarize the current state of knowledge of regeneration in the specialized sense organs in both nonmammalian vertebrates and mammals and discuss possible areas where new advances in regenerative medicine might provide approaches to successfully stimulate sensory receptor cell regeneration. The field of regenerative medicine is still in its infancy, but new approaches using stem cells and reprogramming suggest ways in which the potential for regeneration may be restored in individuals suffering from sensory loss.

Indexed as

Cell TransdifferentiationAnimalsEar, InnerModels, NeurologicalNerve RegenerationNeurogenesisOlfactory MucosaRegenerative MedicineRetinaSensory Receptor CellsSignal Transduction

Identifiers

PMID21835338
PMCPMC4403668
OpenAlexW1990670198

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.