Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21835028›Full record

ArticleBMC systems biology2011

Integrating systems biology models and biomedical ontologies.

Robert Hoehndorf, Michel Dumontier, John H Gennari, Sarala Wimalaratne, Bernard de Bono, Daniel L Cook, Georgios V Gkoutos

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC systems biology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Ontological interpretation of biomedical database content.Journal of biomedical semantics · 2017
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Using the wisdom of the crowds to find critical errors in biomedical ontologies: a study of SNOMED CT.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2015
    Article
  11. Mining Electronic Health Records using Linked Data.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2015
    Article
  12. Combining computational models, semantic annotations and simulation experiments in a graph database.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2015
    Article
  13. BioModels linked dataset.BMC systems biology · 2014
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. CSEO - the Cigarette Smoke Exposure Ontology.Journal of biomedical semantics · 2014
    Article
  18. An empirically derived taxonomy of errors in SNOMED CT.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2014
    Article
  19. Evaluation of research in biomedical ontologies.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2013
    Article
  20. Ontology-Based Querying with Bio2RDF's Linked Open Data.Journal of biomedical semantics · 2013
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Robert HoehndorfDepartment of Genetics, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge, CB2 3EH, UK. rh497@cam.ac.uk
Michel Dumontier
John H Gennari
Sarala Wimalaratne
Bernard de Bono
Daniel L Cook
Georgios V Gkoutos
University of Cambridge · GBUniversity of Washington · USCarleton University · CAEuropean Bioinformatics Institute · GBWellcome Trust · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/G004358/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBG0043581
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSystems biology is an approach to biology that emphasizes the structure and dynamic behavior of biological systems and the interactions that occur within them. To succeed, systems biology crucially depends on the accessibility and integration of data across domains and levels of granularity. Biomedical ontologies were developed to facilitate such an integration of data and are often used to annotate biosimulation models in systems biology.

resultsWe provide a framework to integrate representations of in silico systems biology with those of in vivo biology as described by biomedical ontologies and demonstrate this framework using the Systems Biology Markup Language. We developed the SBML Harvester software that automatically converts annotated SBML models into OWL and we apply our software to those biosimulation models that are contained in the BioModels Database. We utilize the resulting knowledge base for complex biological queries that can bridge levels of granularity, verify models based on the biological phenomenon they represent and provide a means to establish a basic qualitative layer on which to express the semantics of biosimulation models.

conclusionsWe establish an information flow between biomedical ontologies and biosimulation models and we demonstrate that the integration of annotated biosimulation models and biomedical ontologies enables the verification of models as well as expressive queries. Establishing a bi-directional information flow between systems biology and biomedical ontologies has the potential to enable large-scale analyses of biological systems that span levels of granularity from molecules to organisms.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalSoftwareComputer SimulationDatabases, FactualSystems Biology

Identifiers

PMID21835028
PMCPMC3170340
OpenAlexW2136317480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.