Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21834548›Full record

ArticleMolecular pharmaceutics2011

Gene-modified adult stem cells regenerate vertebral bone defect in a rat model.

Dmitriy Sheyn, Ilan Kallai, Wafa Tawackoli, Doron Cohn Yakubovich, Anthony Oh, Susan Su, Xiaoyu Da, Amir Lavi, Nadav Kimelman-Bleich, Yoram Zilberman and 5 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular pharmaceutics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 95 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Non-viral Gene Delivery Methods for Bone and Joints.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Dmitriy SheynDepartment of Surgery and Cedars-Sinai Regenerative Medicine Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Ilan Kallai
Wafa Tawackoli
Doron Cohn Yakubovich
Anthony Oh
Susan Su
Xiaoyu Da
Amir Lavi
Nadav Kimelman-Bleich
Yoram Zilberman
Ning Li
Hyun Bae
Zulma Gazit
Gadi Pelled
Dan Gazit
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center · USHebrew University of Jerusalem · IL

Funding

Engineered Delivery of Adult Versus Fetal Stem Cells for Bone RegenerationR01AR056694 · NIAMS · GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI GULDBERG, ROBERT E · 2009 to 2010
$1.3M
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR056694NIAMS NIH HHS R01AR056694
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vertebral compression fractures (VCFs), the most common fragility fractures, account for approximately 700,000 injuries per year. Since open surgery involves morbidity and implant failure in the osteoporotic patient population, a new minimally invasive biological solution to vertebral bone repair is needed. Previously, we showed that adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs) overexpressing a BMP gene are capable of inducing spinal fusion in vivo. We hypothesized that a direct injection of ASCs, designed to transiently overexpress rhBMP6, into a vertebral bone void defect would accelerate bone regeneration. Porcine ASCs were isolated and labeled with lentiviral vectors that encode for the reporter gene luciferase (Luc) under constitutive (ubiquitin) or inductive (osteocalcin) promoters. The ASCs were first labeled with reporter genes and then nucleofected with an rhBMP6-encoding plasmid. Twenty-four hours later, bone void defects were created in the coccygeal vertebrae of nude rats. The ASC-BMP6 cells were suspended in fibrin gel (FG) and injected into the bone void. A control group was injected with FG alone. The regenerative process was monitored in vivo using microCT, and cell survival and differentiation were monitored using tissue specific reporter genes and bioluminescence imaging (BLI). The surgically treated vertebrae were harvested after 12 weeks and subjected to histological and immunohistochemical (against porcine vimentin) analyses. In vivo BLI detected Luc-expressing cells at the implantation site over a 12-week period. Beginning 2 weeks postoperatively, considerable defect repair was observed in the group treated with ASC-BMP6 cells. The rate of bone formation in the stem cell-treated group was two times faster than that in the FG-treated group, and bone volume at the end point was 2-fold compared to the control group. Twelve weeks after cell injection the bone volume within the void reached the volume measured in native vertebrae. Immunostaining against porcine vimentin indicated that the ASC-BMP6 cells contributed to new bone formation. Here we show the potential of injections of BMP-modified ASCs to repair vertebral bone defects in a rat model. Our results could pave the way to a novel approach for the biological treatment of traumatic and osteoporosis-related vertebral bone injuries.

Indexed as

Bone RegenerationGene Transfer TechniquesAdult Stem CellsAnimalsBone Morphogenetic Protein 6Cells, CulturedFibrinGenes, ReporterHydrogel, Polyethylene Glycol DimethacrylateOsteocalcinPromoter Regions, GeneticRadiographyRandom AllocationRatsRats, NudeRecombinant ProteinsBMP6 protein, humanBone Morphogenetic Protein 6FibrinHydrogel, Polyethylene Glycol DimethacrylateOsteocalcinRecombinant ProteinsUbiquitin

Identifiers

PMID21834548
PMCPMC3220930
OpenAlexW2141106456

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.