Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21834084›Full record

ReviewDevelopmental neurobiology2011

Casting a net on dendritic spines: the extracellular matrix and its receptors.

Lorraine E Dansie, Iryna M Ethell

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Developmental neurobiology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Diverse roles for glycosaminoglycans in neural patterning.Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists · 2018
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lorraine E DansieDivision of Biomedical Sciences, Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Program, University of California Riverside, Riverside, California 92521, USA.
Iryna M Ethell
University of California, Riverside · US

Funding

EphB Signaling in Dendritic Spine Development and RemodelingR01MH067121 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE · PI ETHELL, IRYNA M · 2003 to 2017
$4.6M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH067121
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dendritic spines are dynamic structures that accommodate the majority of excitatory synapses in the brain and are influenced by extracellular signals from presynaptic neurons, glial cells, and the extracellular matrix (ECM). The ECM surrounds dendritic spines and extends into the synaptic cleft, maintaining synapse integrity as well as mediating trans-synaptic communications between neurons. Several scaffolding proteins and glycans that compose the ECM form a lattice-like network, which serves as an attractive ground for various secreted glycoproteins, lectins, growth factors, and enzymes. ECM components can control dendritic spines through the interactions with their specific receptors or by influencing the functions of other synaptic proteins. In this review, we focus on ECM components and their receptors that regulate dendritic spine development and plasticity in the normal and diseased brain.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrainDendritic SpinesExtracellular Matrix ProteinsHumansNeurogenesisNeuronal PlasticityReceptors, Cell SurfaceSynapsesExtracellular Matrix Proteinsextracellular matrix receptorReceptors, Cell Surface

Identifiers

PMID21834084
PMCPMC3192312
OpenAlexW1982402033

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.