Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21833968›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2011

Surgical repair of spontaneous perineal tears that occur during childbirth versus no intervention.

Suzan Ma Elharmeel, Yasmin Chaudhary, Stephanie Tan, Elly Scheermeyer, Ashraf Hanafy, Mieke L van Driel

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02582580 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2015, after this paper: background citation

Effects of Perineal Massage, Vaginal Dilator and Pelvic Floor Muscles Training on the Perineal Integrity Primiparous: A Randomized Controlled Trial Protocol

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversidade Federal de Sao CarlosRan2015 to 2017Enrolled63ConditionsPregnancyArmsPerineal massage, Vaginal Dilator, Pelvic floor muscles training
NCT02588508 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2015, after this paper: background citation

Effectiveness of Warm Packs, Perineal Massage and Hands Off During Labour in the Perineal Outcomes.

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversidade Federal de PernambucoRan2015 to 2016Enrolled201ConditionsPerineal TearArmsWarm packs, Perineal massage
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. A one-stop perineal clinic: our eleven-year experience.International urogynecology journal · 2020
    Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Suzan Ma ElharmeelDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Gold Coast Hospital, 108 Nerang Street, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia, 4215.
Yasmin Chaudhary
Stephanie Tan
Elly Scheermeyer
Ashraf Hanafy
Mieke L van Driel
Gold Coast Hospital · AUThe University of Queensland · AUBond University · AUPrincess Alexandra Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPerineal tears commonly occur during childbirth. They are sutured most of the time. Surgical repair can be associated with adverse outcomes, such as pain, discomfort and interference with normal activities during puerperium and possibly breastfeeding. Surgical repair also has an impact on clinical workload and human and financial resources.

objectivesTo assess the evidence for surgical versus non-surgical management of first- and second-degree perineal tears sustained during childbirth. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (1 May 2011), CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library 2011, Issue 2 of 4) and MEDLINE (Jan 1966 to 2 May 2011). We also searched the reference lists of reviews, guidelines and other publications and contacted authors of identified eligible trials. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the effect on clinical outcomes of suturing versus non-suturing techniques to repair first- and second-degree perineal tears sustained during childbirth. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently assessed trials for inclusion and assessed trial quality. Three review authors independently extracted data. MAIN

resultsWe included two RCTs (involving 154 women) with a low risk of bias. It was not possible to pool the available studies. The two studies do not consistently report outcomes defined in the review. However, no significant differences were observed between the two groups (surgical versus non-surgical repair) in incidence of pain and wound complications, self-evaluated measures of pain at hospital discharge and postpartum and re-initiation of sexual activity. Differences in the use of analgesia varied between the studies, being high in the sutured group in one study. The other trial showed differences in wound closure and poor wound approximation in the non-suturing group, but noted incidentally also that more women were breastfeeding in this group. AUTHORS'

conclusionsThere is limited evidence available from RCTs to guide the choice between surgical or non-surgical repair of first- or second-degree perineal tears sustained during childbirth. Two studies find no difference between the two types of management with regard to clinical outcomes up to eight weeks postpartum. Therefore, at present there is insufficient evidence to suggest that one method is superior to the other with regard to healing and recovery in the early or late postnatal periods. Until further evidence becomes available, clinicians' decisions whether to suture or not can be based on their clinical judgement and the women's preference after informing them about the lack of long-term outcomes and the possible chance of a slower wound healing process, but possible better overall feeling of well being if left un-sutured.

Indexed as

Watchful WaitingAdultFemaleHumansLacerationsObstetric Labor ComplicationsPerineumPregnancyRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRupture, SpontaneousSoft Tissue Injuries

Identifiers

PMID21833968
PMCPMC12145952
OpenAlexW2165252544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.