SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2011
Surgical repair of spontaneous perineal tears that occur during childbirth versus no intervention.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Effects of Perineal Massage, Vaginal Dilator and Pelvic Floor Muscles Training on the Perineal Integrity Primiparous: A Randomized Controlled Trial Protocol
Effectiveness of Warm Packs, Perineal Massage and Hands Off During Labour in the Perineal Outcomes.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.
- Birth-Related Perineal Trauma in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Maternal and child health journal · 2019Pooled it
- Antenatal maternal education for improving postnatal perineal healing for women who have birthed in a hospital setting.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Delayed secondary repair of third- and fourth-degree obstetric anal sphincter injuries: a randomized controlled trial comparing overlapping versus end-to-end sphincter repair.Techniques in coloproctology · 2026Trial
- Randomized Trial of 3 Techniques of Perineal Skin Closure During Second-Degree Perineal Laceration Repair.Journal of midwifery & women's health · 2019Trial
- Perineal Membrane Structural Changes: An Unstudied Aspect of Prolapse.International urogynecology journal · 2026Article
- Surgical adhesive glue to repair first-degree perineal tears in vaginal birth: A randomised controlled clinical trial.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2023Article
- The Skin Antiseptic agents at Vaginal dElivery (SAVE) trial: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.Trials · 2023Article
- Application of Honey to Reduce Perineal Laceration Pain during the Postpartum Period: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- A one-stop perineal clinic: our eleven-year experience.International urogynecology journal · 2020Observational
- Article
- Incidence of and risk factors for perineal trauma: a prospective observational study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPerineal tears commonly occur during childbirth. They are sutured most of the time. Surgical repair can be associated with adverse outcomes, such as pain, discomfort and interference with normal activities during puerperium and possibly breastfeeding. Surgical repair also has an impact on clinical workload and human and financial resources.
objectivesTo assess the evidence for surgical versus non-surgical management of first- and second-degree perineal tears sustained during childbirth. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (1 May 2011), CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library 2011, Issue 2 of 4) and MEDLINE (Jan 1966 to 2 May 2011). We also searched the reference lists of reviews, guidelines and other publications and contacted authors of identified eligible trials. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the effect on clinical outcomes of suturing versus non-suturing techniques to repair first- and second-degree perineal tears sustained during childbirth. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently assessed trials for inclusion and assessed trial quality. Three review authors independently extracted data. MAIN
resultsWe included two RCTs (involving 154 women) with a low risk of bias. It was not possible to pool the available studies. The two studies do not consistently report outcomes defined in the review. However, no significant differences were observed between the two groups (surgical versus non-surgical repair) in incidence of pain and wound complications, self-evaluated measures of pain at hospital discharge and postpartum and re-initiation of sexual activity. Differences in the use of analgesia varied between the studies, being high in the sutured group in one study. The other trial showed differences in wound closure and poor wound approximation in the non-suturing group, but noted incidentally also that more women were breastfeeding in this group. AUTHORS'
conclusionsThere is limited evidence available from RCTs to guide the choice between surgical or non-surgical repair of first- or second-degree perineal tears sustained during childbirth. Two studies find no difference between the two types of management with regard to clinical outcomes up to eight weeks postpartum. Therefore, at present there is insufficient evidence to suggest that one method is superior to the other with regard to healing and recovery in the early or late postnatal periods. Until further evidence becomes available, clinicians' decisions whether to suture or not can be based on their clinical judgement and the women's preference after informing them about the lack of long-term outcomes and the possible chance of a slower wound healing process, but possible better overall feeling of well being if left un-sutured.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.