Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21833954›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2011

Sildenafil for pulmonary hypertension in neonates.

Prakeshkumar S Shah, Arne Ohlsson

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Sildenafil for pulmonary hypertension in neonates.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Sildenafil Exposure in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit.American journal of perinatology · 2019
    Article
  6. Sildenafil in Infants and Children.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2017
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Arterial hypotension and prerenal failure in an extremely preterm infant associated with oral sildenafil.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2015
    Article
  12. Safety of sildenafil in infants*.Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies · 2014
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Prakeshkumar S ShahDepartment of Paediatrics and Department of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Rm 775A, University of Toronto, 600 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5G 1XB.
Arne Ohlsson
University of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPersistent pulmonary hypertension in neonates (PPHN) is associated with high mortality. Currently, the therapeutic mainstay for PPHN is assisted ventilation and administration of inhaled nitric oxide (iNO). However, nitric oxide is costly and may not be appropriate in resource-poor settings. Approximately 30% of patients fail to respond to iNO. High concentrations of phosphodiesterases in the pulmonary vasculature has led to the use of phosphodiesterase inhibitors such as sildenafil or milrinone.

objectivesTo assess the efficacy and safety of sildenafil in the treatment of persistent pulmonary hypertension in neonates. SEARCH STRATEGY: The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library), MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL databases were searched from their inception until December 2010; Clinicaltrials.gov web site, the reference lists of identified trials, and abstracts of meetings were searched without any language restriction. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials of sildenafil compared with placebo or other pulmonary vasodilators, irrespective of dose, route and duration of administration in neonates with PPHN, were included if the trial reported any of the pre-specified outcomes. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: The methodological quality of the trials was assessed regarding how bias was minimized at study entry, during study intervention and at outcomes measurement. Data on relevant outcomes were extracted and the effect size was estimated and reported as relative risk (RR), risk difference (RD) and weighted mean difference (MD) as appropriate. The I-squared (I(2)) test of heterogeneity was applied. MAIN

resultsThree eligible trials that enrolled 77 infants were identified. The methodological quality of the studies indicated low-moderate risk of bias. All studies were performed in resource-limited settings where iNO and high frequency ventilation were not available at the time of study. There was significant reduction in mortality in the sildenafil group (typical RR 0.20, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.57; typical RD -0.38, 95% CI -0.60 to -0.16; Number needed to treat to benefit 3, 95% CI 2 to 6). Physiological parameters of oxygenation (oxygenation index, PaO(2)) suggested a steady improvement after the first dose of sildenafil. No clinically important side effects were identified. AUTHORS'

conclusionsSildenafil in the treatment of PPHN has significant potential especially in resource limited settings. However, a large scale randomised trial comparing sildenafil with the currently used vasodilator, inhaled nitric oxide, is needed to assess efficacy and safety.

Indexed as

HumansHypertension, PulmonaryInfant, NewbornPiperazinesPurinesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSildenafil CitrateSulfonesVasodilator AgentsPiperazinesPurinesSildenafil CitrateSulfonesVasodilator Agents

Identifiers

PMID21833954
OpenAlexW4237859916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.