SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2011
Aspirin for in vitro fertilisation.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Aspirin for in vitro fertilisation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016Pooled it
- Androgens (dehydroepiandrosterone or testosterone) for women undergoing assisted reproduction.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015Pooled it
- Expanded findings from a randomized controlled trial of preconception low-dose aspirin and pregnancy loss.Human reproduction (Oxford, England) · 2016Trial
- Preconception low-dose aspirin and pregnancy outcomes: results from the EAGeR randomised trial.Lancet (London, England) · 2014Trial
- Routine ketorolac at oocyte retrieval decreases postoperative narcotic use by more than 50.F&S reports · 2021Article
- Adjuvants in IVF-evidence for what works and what does not work.Upsala journal of medical sciences · 2020Review
- Add-ons in IVF programme - Hype or Hope?Facts, views & vision in ObGyn · 2015Review
- Clinical utility of antithrombotic prophylaxis in ART procedures: an Italian experience.PloS one · 2014Article
- Evidence-based reproductive medicine: a critical appraisal.Facts, views & vision in ObGyn · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
- Update of
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAspirin is used to improve the outcome in women undergoing in vitro fertilisation despite inconsistent evidence of its efficacy. The most appropriate time to commence aspirin therapy and the length of treatment required are also still to be determined. This is an update of the review first published in 2007.
objectivesTo determine the effectiveness and safety of aspirin for improving the outcome of in vitro fertilisation and intracytoplasmic sperm injection treatment cycles. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group Trials Register, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library January 2011), MEDLINE (1966 to January 2011) and EMBASE (1980 to January 2011) databases. We used the research terms: "(aspirin OR acetylsalicylic acid) AND (in-vitro fertilisation OR intracytoplasmic sperm injection)", combined with the Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group's search strategy, in order to identify randomised controlled trials on aspirin for women undergoing in vitro fertilisation. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently selected studies to include in the review, extracted data and assessed trial quality. MAIN
resultsThe searches identified 13 trials which were eligible for inclusion in the review, including a total of 2653 participants. No significant differences were found between the treatment and control groups for any of the outcomes assessed. No significant differences were found in the meta-analysis of studies investigating the effect of aspirin compared with control on live birth rate (RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.15; three studies and 1053 participants), clinical pregnancy rate (RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.17; 10 studies and 2142 participants), ectopic and miscarriage rates (RR 1.86, 95% CI 0.75 to 4.63; RR 1.10, 95% CI 0.68 to 1.77) respectively (three and five studies involving 1135 and 1497 participants). AUTHORS'
conclusionsUse of aspirin for women undergoing in vitro fertilisation cannot be recommended due to lack of evidence from the current trial data. Adequately powered trials are needed. It was proposed in the initial version of this review that a sample size of 350 women in each group would be required in order to demonstrate a 10% improvement from the use of aspirin, with 80% power at the 5% significance level. Until such evidence is available, this treatment can not be recommended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.