Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21832988›Full record

Trial reportNeuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology2011

Using an experimental medicine model to explore combination effects of pharmacological and cognitive interventions for depression and anxiety.

Michael Browning, Maud Grol, Verena Ly, Guy M Goodwin, Emily A Holmes, Catherine J Harmer

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Early effects of duloxetine on emotion recognition in healthy volunteers.Journal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England) · 2015
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. From neuroscience to evidence based psychological treatments - The promise and the challenge, ECNP March 2016, Nice, France.European neuropsychopharmacology : the journal of the European College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2018
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. MDMA for the treatment of mood disorder: all talk no substance?Therapeutic advances in psychopharmacology · 2015
    Review
  13. Positive Imagery-Based Cognitive Bias Modification as a Web-Based Treatment Tool for Depressed Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Clinical psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2015
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Michael BrowningDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. michael.browning@psych.ox.ac.uk
Maud Grol
Verena Ly
Guy M Goodwin
Emily A Holmes
Catherine J Harmer
University of Oxford · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G0701672Wellcome Trust 081672
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Selective serotonergic reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and cognitive therapies are effective in the treatment of anxiety and depression. Previous research suggests that both forms of treatments may work by altering cognitive biases in the processing of affective information. The current study assessed the effects of combining an SSRI with a cognitive intervention on measures of affective processing bias and resilience to external challenge. A total of 62 healthy participants were randomly assigned to receive either 7 days of citalopram (20 mg) or placebo capsules while also completing either an active or a control version of a computerized cognitive bias training task. After treatment, standard measures of affective processing bias were collected. Participants' resilience to external stress was also tested by measuring the increase in negative symptoms induced by a negative mood induction. Participants who received both citalopram and the active cognitive bias training task showed a smaller alteration in emotional memory and categorization bias than did those who received either active intervention singly. The degree to which memory for negative information was altered by citalopram predicted participants' resistance to the negative mood induction. These results suggest that co-administration of an SSRI and a cognitive training intervention can reduce the effectiveness of either treatment alone in terms of anxiety- and depression-relevant emotional processing. More generally, the findings suggest that pinpointing the cognitive actions of treatments may inform future development of combination strategies in mental health.

Indexed as

Anxiety DisordersCitalopramCognitive Behavioral TherapyCombined Modality TherapyDepressive DisorderFemaleHumansMaleSelective Serotonin Reuptake InhibitorsYoung AdultCitalopramSelective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID21832988
PMCPMC3214161
OpenAlexW2062487623

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.