Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21832033›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2011

Spinal locomotor inputs to individually identified reticulospinal neurons in the lamprey.

James T Buchanan

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Cholinergic Modulation of Locomotor Circuits in Vertebrates.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Reticulospinal Systems for Tuning Motor Commands.Frontiers in neural circuits · 2018
    Review
  4. Tectal microcircuit generating visual selection commands on gaze-controlling neurons.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2015
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Necessary, sufficient and permissive: a single locomotor command neuron important for intersegmental coordination.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2012
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

James T BuchananDept. of Biological Sciences, 530 N. 15th St., Marquette Univ., Milwaukee, WI 53233, USA. james.buchanan@marquette.edu
Marquette University · US

Funding

ROLES OF SPINOBULBAR NEURONS IN LOCOMOTOR ACTIVITYR01NS040755 · NINDS · MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY · PI BUCHANAN, JAMES T · 2001 to 2004
$422k
The Roles of Spinobulbar Neurons in Locomotor ActivityR56NS040755 · NINDS · MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY · PI BUCHANAN, JAMES T · 2007 to 2007
$175k
NINDS NIH HHS NS-40755
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Locomotor feedback signals from the spinal cord to descending brain stem neurons were examined in the lamprey using the uniquely identifiable reticulospinal neurons, the Müller and Mauthner cells. The same identified reticulospinal neurons were recorded in several preparations, under reduced conditions, to address whether an identified reticulospinal neuron shows similar locomotor-related oscillation timing from animal to animal and whether these timing signals can differ significantly from other identified reticulospinal neurons. Intracellular recordings of membrane potential in identified neurons were made in an isolated brain stem-spinal cord preparation with a high-divalent cation solution on the brain stem to suppress indirect neural pathways and with D-glutamate perfusion to the spinal cord to induce fictive swimming. Under these conditions, the identified reticulospinal neurons show significant clustering of the timings of the peaks and troughs of their locomotor-related oscillations. Whereas most identified neurons oscillated in phase with locomotor bursting in ipsilateral ventral roots of the rostral spinal cord, the B1 Müller cell, which has an ipsilateral descending axon, and the Mauthner cell, which has a contralateral descending axon, both had oscillation peaks that were out of phase with the ipsilateral ventral roots. The differences in oscillation timing appear to be due to differences in synaptic input sources as shown by cross-correlations of fast synaptic activity in pairs of Müller cells. Since the main source of the locomotor input under these experimental conditions is ascending neurons in the spinal cord, these experiments suggest that individual reticulospinal neurons can receive locomotor signals from different subsets of these ascending neurons. This result may indicate that the locomotor feedback signals from the spinal locomotor networks are matched in some way to the motor output functions of the individual reticulospinal neurons, which include command signals for turning and for compensatory movements.

Indexed as

PeriodicityAge FactorsAnimalsBrain StemEfferent PathwaysElectrophysiologyFeedback, SensoryLampreysSpinal CordSpinal Nerve RootsSwimmingSynapses

Identifiers

PMID21832033
PMCPMC3214102
OpenAlexW2035416114

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.