Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21832016›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2011

A comprehensive evaluation of the proficiency testing program for the HIV-1 BED incidence assay.

Trudy Dobbs, Xin Liu, Rebecca Anderson, John Nkengasong, Bharat S Parekh

Abstract readEvaluation StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Trudy DobbsInternational Laboratory Branch, Division of Global HIV/AIDS, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Rd., Atlanta, GA 30329, USA.
Xin Liu
Rebecca Anderson
John Nkengasong
Bharat S Parekh

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The HIV-1 BED incidence assay was developed at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and since 2005 has been available as a commercial kit for use in HIV-1 incidence surveillance. A BED-specific proficiency testing (PT) program was initiated in 2006 that included a panel of eight coded specimens (six unique and two duplicates) to participating laboratories. The number of participating laboratories increased from 12 to 38 from 2006 to 2009. Overall, 96.1% of the laboratories reported results, and 95.4% of those reporting achieved a 100% score. The observed mean normalized optical density (OD-n) values of all participants correlated well with the expected OD-n values for all specimens (R(2) = 0.98) used for seven PT rounds. BED testing demonstrated high reproducibility among all laboratories, with an agreement of 99.3% (574/578) between initial and confirmatory classification and regression statistics of R(2) = 0.96, slope = 1.022, and intercept = 0.0066. Reproducibility among duplicate specimens was very high during each PT round, with mean deviation of 1.8%. Analysis of controls and calibrator specimen for all 343 runs showed a coefficient of variation of ca. 20% for raw ODs in the dynamic range, which was reduced to <10% when the OD was normalized (OD-n). Most laboratories that failed the PT assessment had transcriptional errors, kit reagent problems, or specimen handling errors. Thus, the BED-specific PT program enabled us to track performance of different laboratories conducting the BED assay while identifying areas for improvements. This program will also serve as a template for future PT programs for new incidence assays as they become available.

Indexed as

Clinical Laboratory TechniquesHIV-1HIV AntibodiesHIV InfectionsHumansImmunoenzyme TechniquesImmunoglobulin GIncidenceObserver VariationQuality ControlReproducibility of ResultsVirologyHIV AntibodiesImmunoglobulin G

Identifiers

PMID21832016
PMCPMC3187299

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.