Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21830838›Full record

ArticleDrug safety2011

Psychiatric adverse events associated with varenicline: an intensive postmarketing prospective cohort study in New Zealand.

Mira Harrison-Woolrych, Janelle Ashton

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Drug safety, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Nicotine receptor partial agonists for smoking cessation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Effects of short-term varenicline administration on emotional and cognitive processing in healthy, non-smoking adults: a randomized, double-blind, study.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2013
    Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mira Harrison-WoolrychIntensive Medicines Monitoring Programme, Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand. mira.harrison-woolrych@otago.ac.nz
Janelle Ashton
University of Otago · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPsychiatric adverse events, including depression, suicidal ideation and psychotic reactions have been reported in patients taking the smoking cessation medicine varenicline. However, data regarding the frequency of psychiatric adverse reactions in 'real-life' postmarketing use are limited to date.

objectiveThe aim of the study was to calculate the occurrence rates of psychiatric adverse reactions in a nationwide general population prescribed varenicline in New Zealand.

methodsObservational prospective cohort study using Prescription Event Monitoring methods. All New Zealand patients dispensed a prescription for varenicline from 1 April 2007 to 31 March 2008 were included in this study. Patients were followed up by multiple methods, including linkage to national morbidity and mortality datasets, questionnaires to patients' doctors and assessment of spontaneous reports sent to the Intensive Medicines Monitoring Programme. Main outcome measures were occurrence rates of psychiatric adverse events in the total patient cohort and in the subgroup for whom a follow-up questionnaire was returned (the 'responder population').

resultsThe cohort for this study included 3415 patients prescribed varenicline during the first year of monitoring in New Zealand. Follow-up by record linkage was performed for 3353 (98%) patients, and questionnaires were returned for 1394 (42%) of these patients. Of 1394 questionnaires returned, 1310 were valid and defined as the 'responder' population. Sleep disorders, including insomnia, sleep disturbance, dreams and nightmares, were the most frequently reported psychiatric events and were experienced by 56 (4.3%) patients in the responder population. Symptoms of depression were reported by 39 (2.98%) patients in the responder population (24 new-onset depression, 14 worsening of pre-existing depression and 1 report of impaired motivation). Withdrawal reactions after stopping varenicline were reported by 6 (0.46%) patients in the responder population. Serious psychiatric reactions including suicide (one case), suicidal ideation (two cases) and psychotic reactions (three cases) were also identified. Six self-harm events (one fatal, five non-fatal) were identified in the total cohort, giving an occurrence rate of 0.18% (95% CI 0.06, 0.38) in this population.

conclusionsThis intensive postmarketing study of 3415 New Zealand patients demonstrates that psychiatric adverse events are commonly reported in patients taking varenicline. Approximately 3% of patients experienced symptoms of depression and the majority of these cases appeared to have a causal association with varenicline. Serious psychiatric reactions including suicide, suicidal ideation and psychotic reactions were also identified, but these were less frequently reported.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBenzazepinesCohort StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMental DisordersMiddle AgedNew ZealandNicotinic AgonistsProduct Surveillance, PostmarketingProspective StudiesQuinoxalinesBenzazepinesNicotinic AgonistsQuinoxalinesVarenicline

Identifiers

PMID21830838
OpenAlexW14210466

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.