Evidence map›Paper›PMID 2183063›Full record

ReviewMycopathologia1990

Models for studying the role of fungal attachment in colonization and pathogenesis.

M J Kennedy

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Mycopathologia, 1990. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

M J KennedyMicrobiology and Nutrition Research Unit, Upjohn Company, Kalamazoo, MI 49001.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fungal adhesion and aggregation is considered an important event in human, animal and plant disease as well as in the ecology of fungi in nature (e.g., in mating reactions and the dispersion of fungal propagules). Because of this, numerous models have been developed to study fungal adhesion and aggregation mechanisms over the last decade. Unfortunately, however, nearly all of the work in this area has been carried out in simple in vitro models and has focused its attention on that of the attachment process alone, while realitively little effort has been made toward understanding the role adhesion and aggregation plays in colonization or pathogenesis. The emphasis on adhesion and aggregation mechanisms appears, therefore, to have somewhat obscured the study of the interaction of adhesion with other factors that may be of equal or greater importance in these processes and to the development of more complex adhesion models to explore the relationship between adhesion and colonization. Moreover, because it has not generally been appreciated that several methodologic pitfalls accompany the use of simple in vitro adhesion models, there is now emerging a confused literature base with regard to: (i) the nature of the cell wall component(s) of Candida albicans that mediates its attachment to, for example, epithelial cells; (ii) the mechanism(s) of invasion of mucosal and endothelial surfaces; and (iii) the role certain adhesive reactions observed in vitro play in colonization and pathogenesis by this fungus. Therefore, with an emphasis on C. albicans, this paper will attempt to put into perspective the uses and limitations of models for studying the role of fungal attachment in colonization and pathogenesis. In addition, factors that can modify fungal adhesion data will be discussed and the beginnings of a standardized assay to study the adhesion of C. albicans to buccal epithelial cells will be described.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAnimalsCell AdhesionCells, CulturedFungiHumansMouth MucosaMycoses

Identifiers

PMID2183063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.