Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21829747›Full record

Trial reportPLoS neglected tropical diseases2011

A multi-center randomized trial to assess the efficacy of gatifloxacin versus ciprofloxacin for the treatment of shigellosis in Vietnamese children.

Ha Vinh, Vo Thi Cuc Anh, Nguyen Duc Anh, James I Campbell, Nguyen Van Minh Hoang, Tran Vu Thieu Nga, Nguyen Thi Khanh Nhu, Pham Van Minh, Cao Thu Thuy, Pham Thanh Duy and 15 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. The evolutionary history ofMicrobial genomics · 2021
    Article
  5. Medication-induced hyperglycemia: pediatric perspective.BMJ open diabetes research & care · 2020
    Review
  6. Azithromycin Resistance in Shigella spp. in Southeast Asia.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2018
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Ha VinhThe Hospital for Tropical Diseases, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Vo Thi Cuc Anh
Nguyen Duc Anh
James I Campbell
Nguyen Van Minh Hoang
Tran Vu Thieu Nga
Nguyen Thi Khanh Nhu
Pham Van Minh
Cao Thu Thuy
Pham Thanh Duy
Le Thi Phuong
Ha Thi Loan
Mai Thu Chinh
Nguyen Thi Thu Thao
Nguyen Thi Hong Tham
Bui Li Mong
Phan Van Be Bay
Jeremy N Day
Christiane Dolecek
Nguyen Phu Huong Lan
To Song Diep
Jeremy J Farrar
Nguyen Van Vinh Chau
Marcel Wolbers
Stephen Baker
Hospital for Tropical Diseases · VNOxford University Clinical Research Unit · VNHo Chi Minh City Medicine and Pharmacy University · VNNuffield Orthopaedic Centre · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe bacterial genus Shigella is the leading cause of dysentery. There have been significant increases in the proportion of Shigella isolated that demonstrate resistance to nalidixic acid. While nalidixic acid is no longer considered as a therapeutic agent for shigellosis, the fluoroquinolone ciprofloxacin is the current recommendation of the World Health Organization. Resistance to nalidixic acid is a marker of reduced susceptibility to older generation fluoroquinolones, such as ciprofloxacin. We aimed to assess the efficacy of gatifloxacin versus ciprofloxacin in the treatment of uncomplicated shigellosis in children. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsWe conducted a randomized, open-label, controlled trial with two parallel arms at two hospitals in southern Vietnam. The study was designed as a superiority trial and children with dysentery meeting the inclusion criteria were invited to participate. Participants received either gatifloxacin (10 mg/kg/day) in a single daily dose for 3 days or ciprofloxacin (30 mg/kg/day) in two divided doses for 3 days. The primary outcome measure was treatment failure; secondary outcome measures were time to the cessation of individual symptoms. Four hundred and ninety four patients were randomized to receive either gatifloxacin (n=249) or ciprofloxacin (n=245), of which 107 had a positive Shigella stool culture. We could not demonstrate superiority of gatifloxacin and observed similar clinical failure rate in both groups (gatifloxacin; 12.0% and ciprofloxacin; 11.0%, p=0.72). The median (inter-quartile range) time from illness onset to cessation of all symptoms was 95 (66-126) hours for gatifloxacin recipients and 93 (68-120) hours for the ciprofloxacin recipients (Hazard Ratio [95%CI]=0.98 [0.82-1.17], p=0.83).

conclusionsWe conclude that in Vietnam, where nalidixic acid resistant Shigellae are highly prevalent, ciprofloxacin and gatifloxacin are similarly effective for the treatment of acute shigellosis.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsChild, PreschoolCiprofloxacinDysentery, BacillaryFecesFemaleFluoroquinolonesGatifloxacinHospitalsHumansHyperglycemiaHypoglycemiaInfantMaleProportional Hazards ModelsShigellaAnti-Bacterial AgentsCiprofloxacinFluoroquinolonesGatifloxacin

Identifiers

PMID21829747
PMCPMC3149021
OpenAlexW1976722990

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.