Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21829652›Full record

ArticlePloS one2011

Dynamic causal models and physiological inference: a validation study using isoflurane anaesthesia in rodents.

Rosalyn J Moran, Fabienne Jung, Tetsuya Kumagai, Heike Endepols, Rudolf Graf, Raymond J Dolan, Karl J Friston, Klaas E Stephan, Marc Tittgemeyer

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Free energy, precision and learning: the role of cholinergic neuromodulation.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2013
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Electrophysiological Brain Connectivity: Theory and Implementation.IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Not All Predictions Are Equal: "What" and "When" Predictions Modulate Activity in Auditory Cortex through Different Mechanisms.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2018
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. The Cumulative Effects of Predictability on Synaptic Gain in the Auditory Processing Stream.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2017
    Article
  20. Facial Expressions Evoke Differential Neural Coupling in Macaques.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Rosalyn J MoranWellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, United Kingdom. r.moran@fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk
Fabienne Jung
Tetsuya Kumagai
Heike Endepols
Rudolf Graf
Raymond J Dolan
Karl J Friston
Klaas E Stephan
Marc Tittgemeyer

Funding

Wellcome Trust 088130
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Generative models of neuroimaging and electrophysiological data present new opportunities for accessing hidden or latent brain states. Dynamic causal modeling (DCM) uses Bayesian model inversion and selection to infer the synaptic mechanisms underlying empirically observed brain responses. DCM for electrophysiological data, in particular, aims to estimate the relative strength of synaptic transmission at different cell types and via specific neurotransmitters. Here, we report a DCM validation study concerning inference on excitatory and inhibitory synaptic transmission, using different doses of a volatile anaesthetic agent (isoflurane) to parametrically modify excitatory and inhibitory synaptic processing while recording local field potentials (LFPs) from primary auditory cortex (A1) and the posterior auditory field (PAF) in the auditory belt region in rodents. We test whether DCM can infer, from the LFP measurements, the expected drug-induced changes in synaptic transmission mediated via fast ionotropic receptors; i.e., excitatory (glutamatergic) AMPA and inhibitory GABA(A) receptors. Cross- and auto-spectra from the two regions were used to optimise three DCMs based on biologically plausible neural mass models and specific network architectures. Consistent with known extrinsic connectivity patterns in sensory hierarchies, we found that a model comprising forward connections from A1 to PAF and backward connections from PAF to A1 outperformed a model with forward connections from PAF to A1 and backward connections from A1 to PAF and a model with reciprocal lateral connections. The parameter estimates from the most plausible model indicated that the amplitude of fast glutamatergic excitatory postsynaptic potentials (EPSPs) and inhibitory postsynaptic potentials (IPSPs) behaved as predicted by previous neurophysiological studies. Specifically, with increasing levels of anaesthesia, glutamatergic EPSPs decreased linearly, whereas fast GABAergic IPSPs displayed a nonlinear (saturating) increase. The consistency of our model-based in vivo results with experimental in vitro results lends further validity to the capacity of DCM to infer on synaptic processes using macroscopic neurophysiological data.

Indexed as

Models, TheoreticalAnesthetics, InhalationAnimalsBayes TheoremIsofluraneSynaptic TransmissionAnesthetics, InhalationIsoflurane

Identifiers

PMID21829652
PMCPMC3149050

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.