ArticlePloS one2011
Comprehensive phylogenetic reconstruction of amoebozoa based on concatenated analyses of SSU-rDNA and actin genes.
Article in PloS one, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Revisions to the Classification, Nomenclature, and Diversity of Eukaryotes.The Journal of eukaryotic microbiology · 2019Article
- Environmental adaptation ofInternational journal of biological sciences · 2018Article
- Genetic Evidence for Sexuality in Cochliopodium (Amoebozoa).The Journal of heredity · 2017Article
- Between a Pod and a Hard Test: The Deep Evolution of Amoebae.Molecular biology and evolution · 2017Article
- Amoebozoans Are Secretly but Ancestrally Sexual: Evidence for Sex Genes and Potential Novel Crossover Pathways in Diverse Groups of Amoebae.Genome biology and evolution · 2017Article
- Cytoskeletal architecture and its evolutionary significance in amoeboid eukaryotes and their mode of locomotion.Royal Society open science · 2016Article
- Are microbes fundamentally different than macroorganisms? Convergence and a possible case for neutral phenotypic evolution in testate amoeba (Amoebozoa: Arcellinida).Royal Society open science · 2015Article
- Article
- Marine amoebae with cytoplasmic and perinuclear symbionts deeply branching in the Gammaproteobacteria.Scientific reports · 2015Article
- Quest for Orthologs Entails Quest for Tree of Life: In Search of the Gene Stream.Genome biology and evolution · 2015Article
- Building a phylogenomic pipeline for the eukaryotic tree of life - addressing deep phylogenies with genome-scale data.PLoS currents · 2014Article
- Old lineages in a new ecosystem: diversification of arcellinid amoebae (Amoebozoa) and peatland mosses.PloS one · 2014Article
- Did terrestrial diversification of amoebas (amoebozoa) occur in synchrony with land plants?PloS one · 2013Article
- Two-gene phylogeny of bright-spored Myxomycetes (slime moulds, superorder Lucisporidia).PloS one · 2013Article
- Horizontal transfer and evolution of prokaryote transposable elements in eukaryotes.Genome biology and evolution · 2013Article
- Polyphyletic origin of the genus Physarum (Physarales, Myxomycetes) revealed by nuclear rDNA mini-chromosome analysis and group I intron synapomorphy.BMC evolutionary biology · 2012Article
- Evolutionary analysis of the ENTH/ANTH/VHS protein superfamily reveals a coevolution between membrane trafficking and metabolism.BMC genomics · 2012Article
- Sapocribrum chincoteaguense n. gen. n. sp.: A Small, Scale-bearing Amoebozoan with Flabellinid Affinities.The Journal of eukaryotic microbiologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Evolutionary relationships within Amoebozoa have been the subject of controversy for two reasons: 1) paucity of morphological characters in traditional surveys and 2) haphazard taxonomic sampling in modern molecular reconstructions. These along with other factors have prevented the erection of a definitive system that resolves confidently both higher and lower-level relationships. Additionally, the recent recognition that many protosteloid amoebae are in fact scattered throughout the Amoebozoa suggests that phylogenetic reconstructions have been excluding an extensive and integral group of organisms. Here we provide a comprehensive phylogenetic reconstruction based on 139 taxa using molecular information from both SSU-rDNA and actin genes. We provide molecular data for 13 of those taxa, 12 of which had not been previously characterized. We explored the dataset extensively by generating 18 alternative reconstructions that assess the effect of missing data, long-branched taxa, unstable taxa, fast evolving sites and inclusion of environmental sequences. We compared reconstructions with each other as well as against previously published phylogenies. Our analyses show that many of the morphologically established lower-level relationships (defined here as relationships roughly equivalent to Order level or below) are congruent with molecular data. However, the data are insufficient to corroborate or reject the large majority of proposed higher-level relationships (above the Order-level), with the exception of Tubulinea, Archamoebae and Myxogastrea, which are consistently recovered. Moreover, contrary to previous expectations, the inclusion of available environmental sequences does not significantly improve the Amoebozoa reconstruction. This is probably because key amoebozoan taxa are not easily amplified by environmental sequencing methodology due to high rates of molecular evolution and regular occurrence of large indels and introns. Finally, in an effort to facilitate future sampling of key amoebozoan taxa, we provide a novel methodology for genome amplification and cDNA extraction from single or a few cells, a method that is culture-independent and allows both photodocumentation and extraction of multiple genes from natural samples.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.