Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21829467›Full record

ArticlePloS one2011

Transcriptome analysis of epithelial and stromal contributions to mammogenesis in three week prepartum cows.

Theresa Casey, Heather Dover, James Liesman, Lindsey DeVries, Matti Kiupel, Michael Vandehaar, Karen Plaut

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The Use of "Omics" in Lactation Research in Dairy Cows.International journal of molecular sciences · 2017
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Lineage-specific markers of goat mammary cells in primary culture.In vitro cellular & developmental biology. Animal · 2014
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Theresa CaseyDepartment of Animal Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, United States of America. theresa-casey@purdue.edu
Heather Dover
James Liesman
Lindsey DeVries
Matti Kiupel
Michael Vandehaar
Karen Plaut

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transcriptome analysis of bovine mammary development has provided insight into regulation of mammogenesis. However, previous studies primarily examined expression of epithelial and stromal tissues combined, and consequently did not account for tissue specific contribution to mammary development. Our objective was to identify differences in gene expression in epithelial and intralobular stromal compartments. Tissue was biopsied from non-lactating dairy cows 3 weeks prepartum, cut into explants and incubated for 2 hr with insulin and hydrocortisone. Epithelial and intralobular stromal tissues were isolated with laser capture microdissection. Global gene expression was measured with Bovine Affymetrix GeneChips, and data were preprocessed using RMA method. Moderated t-tests from gene-specific linear model analysis with cell type as a fixed effect showed more than 3,000 genes were differentially expressed between tissues (P<0.05; FDR<0.17). Analysis of epithelial and stromal transcriptomes using Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery (DAVID) and Ingenuity Pathways Analysis (IPA) showed that epithelial and stromal cells contributed distinct molecular signatures. Epithelial signatures were enriched with gene sets for protein synthesis, metabolism and secretion. Stromal signatures were enriched with genes that encoded molecules important to signaling, extracellular matrix composition and remodeling. Transcriptome differences also showed evidence for paracrine interactions between tissues in stimulation of IGF1 signaling pathway, stromal reaction, angiogenesis, neurogenesis, and immune response. Molecular signatures point to the dynamic role the stroma plays in prepartum mammogenesis and highlight the importance of examining the roles of cell types within the mammary gland when targeting therapies and studying mechanisms that affect milk production.

Indexed as

Postpartum PeriodAnimalsAnti-Inflammatory AgentsBiomarkersCattleCell ProliferationEpithelial CellsFemaleGene Expression ProfilingHydrocortisoneHypoglycemic AgentsImmunoenzyme TechniquesInsulinLaser Capture MicrodissectionMammary Glands, AnimalOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisAnti-Inflammatory AgentsBiomarkersHydrocortisoneHypoglycemic AgentsInsulinRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID21829467
PMCPMC3146472

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.