ArticleBMJ case reports2009
Sexual history: its importance in averting detrimental misdiagnosis and delayed diagnosis.
Article in BMJ case reports, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Case of Recurrent Skin Abscesses: A Conundrum Solved after Obtaining a Thorough Sexual History.Case reports in infectious diseases · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Two cases where the sexual history proved important in reaching the diagnosis are presented. Case 1 concerns a 37-year-old HIV positive homosexual man, who presented with symptoms of rectal pain associated with bleeding. He was unsuccessfully treated for Crohn disease. A subsequent review of his sexual history led to investigations for venereal infections. A final diagnosis of proctitis secondary to lymphogranuloma venereum was made. The patient was successfully treated with doxycycline and spared an unnecessary colectomy. Case 2 concerns a 22-year-old Caucasian woman under investigation for possible lymphoma. However, the doctor carrying out the biopsy experienced a needle stick injury and the ensuing investigations revealed the patient's HIV positive status and thus the explanation for her hitherto undiagnosed lymphadenopathy. A prior review of her sexual history could have hastened the diagnosis and prevented the need for invasive tests.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.