Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21829197›Full record

Trial reportBritish journal of cancer2011

Effects of lapatinib monotherapy: results of a randomised phase II study in therapy-naive patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

J M Del Campo, R Hitt, P Sebastian, C Carracedo, D Lokanatha, J Bourhis, S Temam, D Cupissol, D De Raucourt, N Maroudias and 7 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in British journal of cancer, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
9.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 113 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Erlotinib, erlotinib-sulindac versus placebo: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled window trial in operable head and neck cancer.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2014
    Trial
  6. A phase II study of lapatinib in recurrent/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2012
    Trial
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. EGFR-targeted therapies in the post-genomic era.Cancer metastasis reviews · 2017
    Review
  20. Trends in Surgical Research in Head and Neck Cancer.Current treatment options in oncology · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 11 institutions in 6 countries.

J M Del CampoVall d'Hebron Hospital, Passeig Vall d'Hebron 119-12908035, Barcelona, Spain.
R Hitt
P Sebastian
C Carracedo
D Lokanatha
J Bourhis
S Temam
D Cupissol
D De Raucourt
N Maroudias
C M Nutting
N Compton
D Midwinter
L Downie
N Biswas-Baldwin
I El-Hariry
K J Harrington
GlaxoSmithKline (United Kingdom) · GBInstitut Gustave Roussy · FRCEA Valduc · FRCentre François Baclesse · FRHippocrateon Private Hospital · CYHospital Universitario 12 De Octubre · ESInstituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas · PEKidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology · INRegional Cancer Center, Thiruvananthapuram · INRoyal Marsden Hospital · GBRoyal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 10588
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLapatinib is a dual inhibitor of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and human EGFR-2 (HER-2) tyrosine kinases. This study investigated the pharmacodynamic and clinical effects of lapatinib in patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN).

methodsIn total, 107 therapy-naive patients with locally advanced SCCHN were randomised (2 : 1) to receive lapatinib or placebo for 2-6 weeks before chemoradiation therapy (CRT). Endpoints included apoptosis and proliferation rates, clinical response, and toxicity.

resultsVersus placebo, lapatinib monotherapy did not significantly increase apoptosis detected by terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated deoxyuridine triphosphate-biotin nick-end labelling or caspase-3 assays. A statistically significant decrease in proliferation using Ki67 assay was observed (P=0.030). In a subset of 40 patients that received 4 weeks of lapatinib or placebo, objective response rate (ORR) was 17% (n=4/24) vs 0% (n=0/16). In the lapatinib single-agent responders, all had EGFR overexpression, 50% had EGFR amplification, and 50% had HER2 expression by immunohistochemistry (including one patient with HER2 amplification). However, these patients showed variable modulation of apoptosis, proliferation, and phosphorylated EGFR on drug treatment. Following CRT, there was a statistically non-significant difference in ORR between lapatinib (70%) and placebo (53%). There was no clear correlation between changes in apoptosis or proliferation and response to chemoradiation. Mucosal inflammation, asthenia, odynophagia, and dysphagia were the most commonly reported adverse events with lapatinib.

conclusionShort-term lapatinib monotherapy did not demonstrate apoptotic changes, but provided evidence of clinical activity in locally advanced SCCHN, and warrants further investigation in this disease.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAlgorithmsAntineoplastic AgentsCarcinomaCarcinoma, Squamous CellDisease ProgressionFemaleHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumansLapatinibMaleMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplasms, Squamous CellAntineoplastic AgentsLapatinibPlacebosQuinazolines

Identifiers

PMID21829197
PMCPMC3188940
OpenAlexW1998417857

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.