Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21829190›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2011

A direct comparison of CellSearch and ISET for circulating tumour-cell detection in patients with metastatic carcinomas.

F Farace, C Massard, N Vimond, F Drusch, N Jacques, F Billiot, A Laplanche, A Chauchereau, L Lacroix, D Planchard and 5 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03979339 (Feasibility of a New Technology for Isolating Circulating Tumour Cells in Selected Cancer Patients and Healthy Volunteers), which is not on this map. Cited by 213 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
213citing papers in PubMed
10.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03979339 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Feasibility of a New Technology for Isolating Circulating Tumour Cells in Selected Cancer Patients and Healthy Volunteers

TypeinterventionalSponsorCentre Oscar LambretRan2020 to 2023Enrolled76ConditionsHER2-positive Metastatic Breast Cancer, Ovarian Cancer, Hormone-resistant Prostate Cancer, Circulating Tumor CellArmsBlood sample collection
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

213 citing papers in PubMed, 396 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Patritumab deruxtecan in HRNature medicine · 2025
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Circulating Tumor Cells: Emerging Frontiers in Cancer Technology.Expert reviews in molecular medicine · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

153 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

F FaraceTranslational Research Laboratory, Institut de Cancérologie Gustave Roussy, 94805 Villejuif, France. farace@gr.fr
C Massard
N Vimond
F Drusch
N Jacques
F Billiot
A Laplanche
A Chauchereau
L Lacroix
D Planchard
S Le Moulec
F André
K Fizazi
J C Soria
P Vielh
Institut Gustave Roussy · FRInserm · FRHIA du Val-de-Grâce à Paris · FRUniversité Paris-Sud · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCirculating tumour cells (CTCs) can provide information on patient prognosis and treatment efficacy. However, there is no universal method to detect CTC currently available. Here, we compared the performance of two CTC detection systems based on the expression of the EpCAM antigen (CellSearch assay) or on cell size (ISET assay).

methodsCirculating tumour cells were enumerated in 60 patients with metastatic carcinomas of breast, prostate and lung origins using CellSearch according to the manufacturer's protocol and ISET by studying cytomorphology and immunolabelling with anti-cytokeratin or lineage-specific antibodies.

resultsConcordant results were obtained in 55% (11 out of 20) of the patients with breast cancer, in 60% (12 out of 20) of the patients with prostate cancer and in only 20% (4 out of 20) of lung cancer patients.

conclusionOur results highlight important discrepancies between the numbers of CTC enumerated by both techniques. These differences depend mostly on the tumour type. These results suggest that technologies limiting CTC capture to EpCAM-positive cells, may present important limitations, especially in patients with metastatic lung carcinoma.

Indexed as

Neoplastic Cells, CirculatingAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntigens, NeoplasmCell Adhesion MoleculesCell CountCell SizeEpithelial Cell Adhesion MoleculeFemaleHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisNeoplasmsAntigens, NeoplasmCell Adhesion MoleculesEpithelial Cell Adhesion Molecule

Identifiers

PMID21829190
PMCPMC3171010
OpenAlexW1965491427

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.