Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21829090›Full record

ArticleChannels (Austin, Tex.)

Measurement of the membrane potential in small cells using patch clamp methods.

James R Wilson, Robert B Clark, Umberto Banderali, Wayne R Giles

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Channels (Austin, Tex.). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Cellular-resolution optogenetics reveals attenuation-by-suppression in visual cortical neurons.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. High-throughput methods for cardiac cellular electrophysiology studies: the road to personalized medicine.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Cardiomyocyte electrophysiology and its modulation: current views and future prospects.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The Resting Potential and KFrontiers in physiology · 2018
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

James R WilsonUniversity of Calgary, AB, Canada.
Robert B Clark
Umberto Banderali
Wayne R Giles

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The resting membrane potential, E(m), of mammalian cells is a fundamental physiological parameter. Even small changes in E(m) can modulate excitability, contractility and rates of cell migration. At present accurate, reproducible measurements of E(m) and determination of its ionic basis remain significant challenges when patch clamp methods are applied to small cells. In this study, a mathematical model has been developed which incorporates many of the main biophysical principles which govern recordings of the resting potential of 'small cells'. Such a prototypical cell (approx. capacitance, 6 pF; input resistance 5 GΩ) is representative of neonatal cardiac myocytes, and other cells in the cardiovascular system (endothelium, fibroblasts) and small cells in other tissues, e.g. bone (osteoclasts) articular joints (chondrocytes) and the pancreas (β cells). Two common experimental conditions have been examined: (1) when the background K(+) conductance is linear; and (2) when this K(+) conductance is highly nonlinear and shows pronounced inward rectification. In the case of a linear K(+) conductance, the presence of a "leakage" current through the seal resistance between the cell membrane and the patch pipette always depolarizes E(m). Our calculations confirm that accurate characterization of E(m) is possible when the seal resistance is at least 5 times larger than the input resistance of the targeted cell. Measurement of E(m) under conditions in which the main background current includes a markedly nonlinear K(+) conductance (due to inward rectification) yields complex and somewhat counter-intuitive findings. In fact, there are at least two possible stable values of resting membrane potential for a cell when the nonlinear, inwardly rectifying K(+) conductance interacts with the seal current. This type of bistable behavior has been reported in a variety of small mammalian cells, including those from the heart, endothelium, smooth muscle and bone. Our theoretical treatment of these two common experimental situations provides useful mechanistic insights, and suggests practical methods by which these significant limitations, and their impact, can be minimized.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAnimalsCells, CulturedHumansMembrane PotentialsMyocytes, CardiacPatch-Clamp TechniquesRabbits

Identifiers

PMID21829090
PMCPMC3265801

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.