ReviewEuropean heart journal2012
Cardiac imaging: does radiation matter?
Review in European heart journal, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05758779 (Coronary CT Screening of Patients With Familial Hypercholesterolemia - The Prevalence of Subclinical Atherosclerosis in Familial Hypercholesterolemia in the Region of Southern Denmark), which is not on this map. Cited by 32 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Coronary CT Screening of Patients With Familial Hypercholesterolemia - The Prevalence of Subclinical Atherosclerosis in Familial Hypercholesterolemia in the Region of Southern Denmark
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed.
- Left atrial size and function as assessed by computed tomography in cardiac resynchronization therapy: Association to echocardiographic and clinical outcome.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2017Trial
- The Danish Cardiovascular Screening Trial (DANCAVAS): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.Trials · 2015Trial
- Trial
- Trial
- Interobserver agreement for the detection of atherosclerotic plaque in coronary CT angiography: comparison of two low-dose image acquisition protocols with standard retrospectively ECG-gated reconstruction.European radiology · 2012Trial
- Consequences of ionizing radiation exposure to the cardiovascular system.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2024Review
- CanCHD Study of Hematopoietic Cancers in Children With and Without Genetic Syndromes.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2024Article
- Article
- Major adverse cardiac event rates in moderate-risk patients: Does prior coronary disease matter?Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2022Article
- Assessment of the routine reporting of very low-dose exercise-first myocardial perfusion SPECT from a large-scale real-world cohort and correlation with the subsequent reporting of coronary stenosis at angiography.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2022Article
- Scoring systems for the triage and assessment of short-term cardiovascular risk in patients with acute chest pain.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2021Review
- The ethical dilemma of emergency department patients with low-risk chest pain.Emergency medicine journal : EMJ · 2021Article
- The disutility of stress testing in low-risk HEART Pathway patients.The American journal of emergency medicine · 2021Article
- 8-Hydroxy-2-Deoxyguanosine as Oxidative DNA Damage Biomarker of Medical Ionizing Radiation: A Scoping Review.Journal of biomedical physics & engineering · 2021Article
- Radiation exposure after myocardial perfusion imaging with Cadmium-Zinc-Telluride camera versus conventional camera.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021Article
- The association between aortic valve calcification, cardiovascular risk factors, and cardiac size and function in a general population.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2021Article
- Increased Cancer Incidence Following up to 15 Years after Cardiac Catheterization in Infants under One Year between 1980 and 1998-A Single Center Observational Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Article
- Radiation-Induced Heart Diseases: Protective Effects of Natural Products.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2019Review
- Effects of menaquinone-7 supplementation in patients with aortic valve calcification: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.BMJ open · 2018Article
- Cardiovascular diseases related to ionizing radiation: The risk of low-dose exposure (Review).International journal of molecular medicine · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The use of ionizing radiation in cardiovascular imaging has generated considerable discussion. Radiation should not be considered in isolation, but rather in the context of a careful examination of the benefits, risks, and costs of cardiovascular imaging. Such consideration requires an understanding of some fundamental aspects of the biology, physics, epidemiology, and terminology germane to radiation, as well as principles of radiological protection. This paper offers a concise, contemporary perspective on these areas by addressing pertinent questions relating to radiation and its application to cardiac imaging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.