Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21827414›Full record

ReviewCurrent pharmaceutical design2011

Glioma stem cell maintenance: the role of the microenvironment.

John M Heddleston, Masahiro Hitomi, Monica Venere, William A Flavahan, Kenneth Yang, Youngmi Kim, Sana Minhas, Jeremy N Rich, Anita B Hjelmeland

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current pharmaceutical design, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 86 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

John M HeddlestonDepartment of Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA.
Masahiro Hitomi
Monica Venere
William A Flavahan
Kenneth Yang
Youngmi Kim
Sana Minhas
Jeremy N Rich
Anita B Hjelmeland
Cleveland Clinic · USCase Comprehensive Cancer CenterCleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine · USInstitute of Molecular Medicine · IN

Funding

MEDICAL SCIENTIST TRAINING PROGRAMT32GM007250 · NIGMS · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI HUANG, ALEX YEE-CHEN · 1985 to 2023
$33.4M
Targeting Brain Tumor Stem Cells Through Novel Therapeutic CombinationsR01CA154130 · NCI · CLEVELAND CLINIC LERNER COM-CWRU · PI RICH, JEREMY N · 2010 to 2014
$1.9M
Stem Cell-Like Glioma Cells in AngiogenesisR01CA129958 · NCI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI RICH, JEREMY N · 2008 to 2012
$1.6M
A20 Promotes Glioma Stem Cell Mediated TumorigenesisR01CA151522 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI HJELMELAND, ANITA BORTON · 2010 to 2014
$1.2M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA129958NCI NIH HHS R01 CA151522NCI NIH HHS R01 CA154130NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007250
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glioblastomas are highly lethal cancers for which conventional therapies provide only palliation. The cellular heterogeneity of glioblastomas is manifest in genetic and epigenetic variation with both stochastic and hierarchical models informing cellular phenotypes. At the apex of the hierarchy is a self-renewing, tumorigenic, cancer stem cell (CSC). The significance of CSCs is underscored by their resistance to cytotoxic therapies, invasive potential, and promotion of angiogenesis. Thus, targeting CSCs may offer therapeutic benefit and sensitize tumors to conventional treatment, demanding elucidation of CSC regulation. Attention has been paid to intrinsic cellular systems in CSCs, but recognition of extrinsic factors is evolving. Glioma stem cells (GSCs) are enriched in functional niches--prominently the perivascular space and hypoxic regions. These niches provide instructive cues to maintain GSCs and induce cellular plasticity towards a stem-like phenotype. GSC-maintaining niches may therefore offer novel therapeutic targets but also signal additional complexity with perhaps different pools of GSCs governed by different molecular mechanisms that must be targeted for tumor control.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorAngiogenesis InhibitorsAnimalsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedBevacizumabBrain NeoplasmsCell HypoxiaCellular MicroenvironmentEpigenesis, GeneticGlioblastomaHumansNeoplastic Stem CellsOxygenPluripotent Stem CellsVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AAngiogenesis InhibitorsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedBevacizumabBiomarkers, TumorOxygenVascular Endothelial Growth Factor A

Identifiers

PMID21827414
PMCPMC3615428
OpenAlexW2109746323

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.