Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21826795›Full record

ArticleChemMedChem2011

Bis[3,5-bis(benzylidene)-4-oxo-1-piperidinyl]amides: a novel class of potent cytotoxins.

Swagatika Das, Umashankar Das, Armando Varela-Ramírez, Carolina Lema, Renato J Aguilera, Jan Balzarini, Erik De Clercq, Stephen G Dimmock, Dennis K J Gorecki, Jonathan R Dimmock

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ChemMedChem, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Evaluation of α,β-unsaturated ketones as antileishmanial agents.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2015
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Swagatika DasDrug Design & Discovery Research Group, College of Pharmacy & Nutrition, University of Saskatchewan, 216 Thorvaldson, 110 Science Place, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7N 5C9, Canada.
Umashankar Das
Armando Varela-Ramírez
Carolina Lema
Renato J Aguilera
Jan Balzarini
Erik De Clercq
Stephen G Dimmock
Dennis K J Gorecki
Jonathan R Dimmock

Funding

TOXICOLOGY PROJECTG12RR008124 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS EL PASO · PI WALSH, ELIZABETH J · 1992 to 2011
$20.8M
CIHR 53171NCRR NIH HHS 5G12RR008124-16A1NCRR NIH HHS G12 RR008124
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The principal objective of this study was the examination of the theory of cytotoxic synergism. In this exploratory study, we tested the hypothesis that doubling the number of sites available for thiol alkylation in a series of candidate cytotoxins increases potency more than two-fold. This concept was verified in one-third of our comparisons using human Molt 4/C8 and CEM T-lymphocytes and murine L1210 cells. In addition, the significant potencies of various members of our compound series justified further studies. Molecular modeling revealed that relative locations of the amidic groups correlate with cytotoxicity. A potent cytotoxic compound, 1,2-bis(3,5-dibenzylidene-4-oxo-piperidin-1-yl)ethane-1,2-dione (1a) inhibited the growth of a large number of human tumor cell lines and displayed greater toxicity toward certain non-adherent cells than toward adherent neoplasms or fibroblasts. The mode of action of 1a includes induction of apoptosis and necrosis.

Indexed as

AlkylationAmidesAnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsBenzylidene CompoundsCell Line, TumorCell SurvivalCytotoxinsDrug Screening Assays, AntitumorHumansMicePiperidones1,2-bis(3,5-dibenzylidene-4-oxopiperidin-1-yl)ethane-1,2-dioneAmidesAntineoplastic AgentsBenzylidene CompoundsCytotoxinsPiperidones

Identifiers

PMID21826795
PMCPMC3344817

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.