Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21826576›Full record

Trial reportAnnals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine2011

A randomized trial comparing the effect of two phone-based interventions on colorectal cancer screening adherence.

Usha Menon, Rhonda Belue, Stéphanie Wahab, Kathryn Rugen, Anita Y Kinney, Peter Maramaldi, Debra Wujcik, Laura A Szalacha

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03819920 (Does Knowing One's Estimated Colorectal Cancer Risk Influence Screening Behavior?), which is not on this map. Cited by 38 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03819920 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2015, after this paper: background citation

Does Knowing One's Estimated Colorectal Cancer Risk Influence Screening Behavior?

TypeinterventionalSponsorStanford UniversityRan2015 to 2019Enrolled229ConditionsColorectal CancerArmsRisk Assessment (CCRAT), Usual Care (UC)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Patient-mediated interventions to improve professional practice.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. An RCT to Increase Breast and Colorectal Cancer Screening.American journal of preventive medicine · 2020
    Trial
  11. Effects of a Community-to-Clinic Navigation Intervention on Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Underserved People.Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine · 2020
    Trial
  12. Trial
  13. A Randomized Trial to Compare a Tailored Web-Based Intervention and Tailored Phone Counseling to Usual Care for Increasing Colorectal Cancer Screening.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2018
    Trial
  14. Effectiveness of reminder strategies on cancer screening adherence: a randomised controlled trial.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2018
    Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Impact of Risk Assessment and Tailored versus Nontailored Risk Information on Colorectal Cancer Testing in Primary Care: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2015
    Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Usha MenonCollege of Nursing and Health Innovation and the Mayo Clinic Cancer Center, Arizona State University, Phoenix, USA. Usha.Menon@asu.edu
Rhonda Belue
Stéphanie Wahab
Kathryn Rugen
Anita Y Kinney
Peter Maramaldi
Debra Wujcik
Laura A Szalacha
Institute of Behavioral Sciences · JPArizona State University · USPennsylvania State University · USPortland State University · USSociety for Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics · US

Funding

TrainingU54CA163072 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Karen Marie Winkfield · 2011 to 2026
$20.1M
Increasing CRC Screening in Primary Care SettingsR01NR008425 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI MENON, USHA · 2004 to 2007
$2.0M
NCI NIH HHS U54 CA163072NINR NIH HHS R01 NR008425NINR NIH HHS R01NR8425
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEarly-stage diagnosis of colorectal cancer is associated with high survival rates; screening prevalence, however, remains suboptimal. PURPOSE: This study seeks to test the hypothesis that participants receiving telephone-based tailored education or motivational interviewing had higher colorectal cancer screening completion rates compared to usual care.

methodsPrimary care patients not adherent with colorectal cancer screening and with no personal or family history of cancer (n = 515) were assigned by block randomization to control (n = 169), tailored education (n = 168), or motivational interview (n = 178). The response rate was 70%; attrition was 24%.

resultsHighest screening occurred in the tailored education group (23.8%, p < .02); participants had 2.2 times the odds of completing a post-intervention colorectal cancer screening than did the control group (AOR = 2.2, CI = 1.2-4.0). Motivational interviewing was not associated with significant increase in post-intervention screening.

conclusionsTailored education showed promise as a feasible strategy to increase colorectal cancer screening.

Indexed as

Mass ScreeningMotivationTelephoneAgedAged, 80 and overColorectal NeoplasmsCounselingEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHealth PromotionHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedPatient Acceptance of Health CarePatient Education as Topic

Identifiers

PMID21826576
PMCPMC3232176
OpenAlexW1984362940

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.