Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21826209›Full record

ArticlePloS one2011

Co-transplantation of olfactory ensheathing cells from mucosa and bulb origin enhances functional recovery after peripheral nerve lesion.

Nicolas Guérout, Alexandre Paviot, Nicolas Bon-Mardion, Célia Duclos, Damien Genty, Laetitia Jean, Olivier Boyer, Jean-Paul Marie

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Peripheral glia diversity.Journal of anatomy · 2022
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Olfactory Ensheathing Cells: A Trojan Horse for Glioma Gene Therapy.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2019
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Neurotransplantation: lux et veritas, fiction or reality?Journal of neurosurgical sciences · 2011
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Nicolas GuéroutExperimental Surgery Laboratory, Groupe de Recherche sur le Handicap Ventilatoire (GRHV), UPRES EA 3830, Institut de Recherche et d'Innovation Biomédicale de Haute Normandie (IRIB), Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, University of Rouen, Rouen, France. nicolas_guerout_76@hotmail.com
Alexandre Paviot
Nicolas Bon-Mardion
Célia Duclos
Damien Genty
Laetitia Jean
Olivier Boyer
Jean-Paul Marie
Université de Rouen Normandie · FRHôpital Charles-Nicolle · FRInstitute for Research and Innovation in Biomedicine · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Olfactory ensheathing cells (OECs) represent an interesting candidate for cell therapy and could be obtained from olfactory mucosa (OM-OECs) or olfactory bulbs (OB-OECs). Recent reports suggest that, depending on their origin, OECs display different functional properties. We show here the complementary and additive effects of co-transplanting OM-OECs and OB-OECs after lesion of a peripheral nerve. For this, a selective motor denervation of the laryngeal muscles was performed by a section/anastomosis of the recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN). Two months after surgery, recovery of the laryngeal movements and synkinesis phenonema were analyzed by videolaryngoscopy. To complete these assessments, measure of latency and potential duration were determined by electrophysiological recordings and myelinated nerve fiber profiles were defined based on toluidine blue staining. To explain some of the mechanisms involved, tracking of GFP positive OECs was performed. It appears that transplantation of OM-OECs or OB-OECs displayed opposite abilities to improve functional recovery. Indeed, OM-OECs increased recuperation of laryngeal muscles activities without appropriate functional recovery. In contrast, OB-OECs induced some functional recovery by enhancing axonal regrowth. Importantly, co-transplantation of OM-OECs and OB-OECs supported a major functional recovery, with reduction of synkinesis phenomena. This study is the first which clearly demonstrates the complementary and additive properties of OECs obtained from olfactory mucosa and olfactory bulb to improve functional recovery after transplantation in a nerve lesion model.

Indexed as

AnimalsElectromyographyLaryngoscopyMaleNerve RegenerationOlfactory BulbOlfactory MucosaPeripheral NervesPeripheral Nervous System DiseasesRatsSciatic Neuropathy

Identifiers

PMID21826209
PMCPMC3149611
OpenAlexW2070240402

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.