Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21826181›Full record

ReviewClinical & developmental immunology2011

Cytokines: the future of intranasal vaccine adjuvants.

Afton L Thompson, Herman F Staats

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical & developmental immunology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. How Long Will It Take to Launch an EffectiveInfection and drug resistance · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Genome based evolutionary lineage of SARS-CoV-2 towards the development of novel chimeric vaccine.Infection, genetics and evolution : journal of molecular epidemiology and evolutionary genetics in infectious diseases · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Advances in Fungal Peptide Vaccines.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Epitope Prediction by Novel Immunoinformatics Approach: A State-of-the-art Review.International journal of peptide research and therapeutics · 2020
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Afton L ThompsonDepartment of Pathology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
Herman F Staats
Duke Medical Center · USDuke University Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to its potential as an effective, needle-free route of immunization for use with subunit vaccines, nasal immunization continues to be evaluated as a route of immunization in both research and clinical studies. However, as with other vaccination routes, subunit vaccines often require the addition of adjuvants to induce potent immune responses. Unfortunately, many commonly used experimental vaccine adjuvants, such as cholera toxin and E. coli heat-labile toxin, are too toxic for use in humans. Because new adjuvants are needed, cytokines have been evaluated for their ability to provide effective adjuvant activity when delivered by the nasal route in both animal models and in limited human studies. It is the purpose of this paper to discuss the potential of cytokines as nasal vaccine adjuvants.

Indexed as

Adjuvants, ImmunologicAdministration, IntranasalAnimalsBacterial ToxinsCholera ToxinCytokinesEnterotoxinsEscherichia coli ProteinsHumansVaccinationVaccinesAdjuvants, ImmunologicBacterial ToxinsCholera ToxinCytokinesEnterotoxinsEscherichia coli Proteinsheat-labile enterotoxin, E coliVaccines

Identifiers

PMID21826181
PMCPMC3150188
OpenAlexW1994593239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.