Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21825072›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of cell biology2011

Visualization of dynein-dependent microtubule gliding at the cell cortex: implications for spindle positioning.

Eva M Gusnowski, Martin Srayko

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of cell biology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Polarity Sorting of Microtubules in the Axon.Trends in neurosciences · 2018
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Eva M GusnowskiDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Martin Srayko

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dynein motors move along the microtubule (MT) lattice in a processive "walking" manner. In the one-cell Caenorhabditis elegans embryo, dynein is required for spindle-pulling forces during mitosis. Posteriorly directed spindle-pulling forces are higher than anteriorly directed forces, and this imbalance results in posterior spindle displacement during anaphase and an asymmetric division. To address how dynein could be asymmetrically activated to achieve posterior spindle displacement, we developed an assay to measure dynein's activity on individual MTs at the embryo cortex. Our study reveals that cortical dynein motors maintain a basal level of activity that propels MTs along the cortex, even under experimental conditions that drastically reduce anaphase spindle forces. This suggests that dynein-based MT gliding is not sufficient for anaphase spindle-pulling force. Instead, we find that this form of dynein activity is most prominent during spindle centering in early prophase. We propose a model whereby different dynein-MT interactions are used for specific spindle-positioning tasks in the one-cell embryo.

Indexed as

Caenorhabditis elegansAdenosine TriphosphatasesAnaphaseAnimalsBlotting, WesternCaenorhabditis elegans ProteinsCell Cycle ProteinsCell DivisionDyneinsEmbryo, NonmammalianGTP-Binding ProteinsKataninMicrotubule-Associated ProteinsMicrotubulesMitosisModels, BiologicalAdenosine TriphosphatasesCaenorhabditis elegans ProteinsCell Cycle ProteinsDyneinsGTP-Binding ProteinsKataninlin-5 protein, C elegansMicrotubule-Associated ProteinsRNA, Small Interfering

Identifiers

PMID21825072
PMCPMC3153651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.