ArticleInfection and immunity2011
Anaerobic respiration of Escherichia coli in the mouse intestine.
Article in Infection and immunity, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 73 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
73 citing papers in PubMed, 130 citations in OpenAlex.
- Metabolic strategies of Enterobacteriaceae gut colonization.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2026Review
- The role of cytochrome oxidases in bacterial virulence.Infection and immunity · 2026Review
- Infection strategies ofGut microbes reports · 2026Review
- Hijacking anaerobic metabolism to restore antibiotic efficacy inApplied and environmental microbiology · 2025Article
- Gene-level analysis of core carbohydrate metabolism across the Enterobacteriaceae pan-genome.Communications biology · 2025Article
- From the Gut to the Brain: Transcriptomic Insights into Neonatal MeningitisPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Interplay between chemotaxis, quorum sensing, and metabolism regulates Escherichia coli-Salmonella Typhimurium interactions in vivo.PLoS pathogens · 2025Article
- Monosaccharides drive Salmonella gut colonization in a context-dependent or -independent manner.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Nutrition ofEcoSal Plus · 2024Review
- Deletion of both anaerobic regulator genes fnr and narL compromises the colonization of Salmonella Typhimurium in mice model.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2024Article
- Amino Acid-Induced Chemotaxis Plays a Key Role in the Adaptation ofMicroorganisms · 2024Article
- Article
- Nitrogen assimilation bymBio · 2024Article
- Enterohaemorrhagic E. coli utilizes host- and microbiota-derived L-malate as a signaling molecule for intestinal colonization.Nature communications · 2023Article
- gutSMASH predicts specialized primary metabolic pathways from the human gut microbiota.Nature biotechnology · 2023Article
- Asuc_0142 ofMicrobiology (Reading, England) · 2023Article
- Article
- Role of themBio · 2023Article
- Article
- Nonredundant Dimethyl Sulfoxide Reductases Influence Salmonella enterica Serotype Typhimurium Anaerobic Growth and Virulence.Infection and immunity · 2023Article
13 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The intestine is inhabited by a large microbial community consisting primarily of anaerobes and, to a lesser extent, facultative anaerobes, such as Escherichia coli, which we have shown requires aerobic respiration to compete successfully in the mouse intestine (S. A. Jones et al., Infect. Immun. 75:4891-4899, 2007). If facultative anaerobes efficiently lower oxygen availability in the intestine, then their sustained growth must also depend on anaerobic metabolism. In support of this idea, mutants lacking nitrate reductase or fumarate reductase have extreme colonization defects. Here, we further explore the role of anaerobic respiration in colonization using the streptomycin-treated mouse model. We found that respiratory electron flow is primarily via the naphthoquinones, which pass electrons to cytochrome bd oxidase and the anaerobic terminal reductases. We found that E. coli uses nitrate and fumarate in the intestine, but not nitrite, dimethyl sulfoxide, or trimethylamine N-oxide. Competitive colonizations revealed that cytochrome bd oxidase is more advantageous than nitrate reductase or fumarate reductase. Strains lacking nitrate reductase outcompeted fumarate reductase mutants once the nitrate concentration in cecal mucus reached submillimolar levels, indicating that fumarate is the more important anaerobic electron acceptor in the intestine because nitrate is limiting. Since nitrate is highest in the absence of E. coli, we conclude that E. coli is the only bacterium in the streptomycin-treated mouse large intestine that respires nitrate. Lastly, we demonstrated that a mutant lacking the NarXL regulator (activator of the NarG system), but not a mutant lacking the NarP-NarQ regulator, has a colonization defect, consistent with the advantage provided by NarG. The emerging picture is one in which gene regulation is tuned to balance expression of the terminal reductases that E. coli uses to maximize its competitiveness and achieve the highest possible population in the intestine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.