Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21825069›Full record

ArticleInfection and immunity2011

Anaerobic respiration of Escherichia coli in the mouse intestine.

Shari A Jones, Terri Gibson, Rosalie C Maltby, Fatema Z Chowdhury, Valley Stewart, Paul S Cohen, Tyrrell Conway

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infection and immunity, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 73 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
73citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

73 citing papers in PubMed, 130 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Infection strategies ofGut microbes reports · 2026
    Review
  4. Hijacking anaerobic metabolism to restore antibiotic efficacy inApplied and environmental microbiology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Nutrition ofEcoSal Plus · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Microbiology spectrum · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Asuc_0142 ofMicrobiology (Reading, England) · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Role of themBio · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

13 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Shari A JonesDepartment of Botany and Microbiology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019-0245, USA.
Terri Gibson
Rosalie C Maltby
Fatema Z Chowdhury
Valley Stewart
Paul S Cohen
Tyrrell Conway
University of Oklahoma · USUniversity of California, Davis · USUniversity of Rhode Island · US

Funding

GROWTH AND COLONIZATION OF THE INTESTINE BY E COLIR01AI048945 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA NORMAN · PI CONWAY, TYRRELL · 2000 to 2008
$3.4M
Symbiosis of E. coli and the Intestinal Microbiota in a Mouse ModelR01GM095370 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA · PI CONWAY, TYRRELL · 2011 to 2014
$1.6M
Growth and Colonization of the Intestine by E. coliR56AI048945 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA · PI CONWAY, TYRRELL · 2009 to 2009
$462k
NIAID NIH HHS AI48945NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI048945NIAID NIH HHS R56 AI048945NIGMS NIH HHS GM095370NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM095370
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The intestine is inhabited by a large microbial community consisting primarily of anaerobes and, to a lesser extent, facultative anaerobes, such as Escherichia coli, which we have shown requires aerobic respiration to compete successfully in the mouse intestine (S. A. Jones et al., Infect. Immun. 75:4891-4899, 2007). If facultative anaerobes efficiently lower oxygen availability in the intestine, then their sustained growth must also depend on anaerobic metabolism. In support of this idea, mutants lacking nitrate reductase or fumarate reductase have extreme colonization defects. Here, we further explore the role of anaerobic respiration in colonization using the streptomycin-treated mouse model. We found that respiratory electron flow is primarily via the naphthoquinones, which pass electrons to cytochrome bd oxidase and the anaerobic terminal reductases. We found that E. coli uses nitrate and fumarate in the intestine, but not nitrite, dimethyl sulfoxide, or trimethylamine N-oxide. Competitive colonizations revealed that cytochrome bd oxidase is more advantageous than nitrate reductase or fumarate reductase. Strains lacking nitrate reductase outcompeted fumarate reductase mutants once the nitrate concentration in cecal mucus reached submillimolar levels, indicating that fumarate is the more important anaerobic electron acceptor in the intestine because nitrate is limiting. Since nitrate is highest in the absence of E. coli, we conclude that E. coli is the only bacterium in the streptomycin-treated mouse large intestine that respires nitrate. Lastly, we demonstrated that a mutant lacking the NarXL regulator (activator of the NarG system), but not a mutant lacking the NarP-NarQ regulator, has a colonization defect, consistent with the advantage provided by NarG. The emerging picture is one in which gene regulation is tuned to balance expression of the terminal reductases that E. coli uses to maximize its competitiveness and achieve the highest possible population in the intestine.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, BacterialOxygen ConsumptionAnaerobiosisAnimalsDNA-Binding ProteinsElectron TransportEscherichia coliEscherichia coli ProteinsFumaratesIntestine, LargeMiceNitratesProtein KinasesDNA-Binding ProteinsEscherichia coli ProteinsFumaratesNarL protein, E colinarX protein, E coliNitratesProtein Kinases

Identifiers

PMID21825069
PMCPMC3187261
OpenAlexW2140668929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.