ArticleBMC genomics2011
BLAST Ring Image Generator (BRIG): simple prokaryote genome comparisons.
Article in BMC genomics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2,013 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2,013 citing papers in PubMed.
- Linking oxidative stress defense to biofilm architecture: Ohr mediates strain-dependent persistence inVirulence · 2026Article
- Genomic analyses identify nosocomial transmission of ST23 carbapenem-resistant hypervirulentVirulence · 2026Article
- Article
- Genomic characterization ofVirulence · 2026Article
- Phylogenomic framework and virulence gene boundaries of emerging Shiga toxin-producingVirulence · 2026Article
- ZoonoticEmerging microbes & infections · 2026Article
- Comparative genomics of carbapenem resistance and virulence associated with respiratory tract and bloodstream infections in carbapenem-resistantVirulence · 2026Article
- Global spread of carbapenem-resistantOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2026Article
- Genomic characterization ofOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2026Article
- Dual resistance to carbapenems and colistin inEmerging microbes & infections · 2026Article
- Development of a multiplex PCR for detection of pathogenic Mycobacterium orygis in cattle tissues harboring tuberculous-like lesions: a pilot study.Tropical animal health and production · 2026Article
- Molecular characterization and evolutionary dynamics of a mixed begomovirus infection associated with chilli leaf curl disease in Odisha, India.Virus genes · 2026Article
- ISAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2026Article
- Outbreak of Multidrug-Resistant (MDR) Acinetobacter baumannii ST-15 Strains Co-producing OXA-23 and OXA-58 in South America.Current microbiology · 2026Article
- Genomic characterization ofMicrobiology (Reading, England) · 2026Article
- Pathogenome and Plasmid-Borne Antimicrobial Resistance Phenotypes in a Multidrug-Resistant O111:H8 Shiga Toxin-ProducingbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Antimicrobial Resistance and Genomic Characterization of a Novel ST181Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Transferable IncHI2-AssociatedFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Genomic characterization of KPC-2 and NDM coproducing carbapenem-resistantMicrobiology spectrum · 2026Article
- Strain-level molecular and infection traits are associated with differences in phage efficacy against Pseudomonas aeruginosa.Scientific reports · 2026Article
1,953 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundVisualisation of genome comparisons is invaluable for helping to determine genotypic differences between closely related prokaryotes. New visualisation and abstraction methods are required in order to improve the validation, interpretation and communication of genome sequence information; especially with the increasing amount of data arising from next-generation sequencing projects. Visualising a prokaryote genome as a circular image has become a powerful means of displaying informative comparisons of one genome to a number of others. Several programs, imaging libraries and internet resources already exist for this purpose, however, most are either limited in the number of comparisons they can show, are unable to adequately utilise draft genome sequence data, or require a knowledge of command-line scripting for implementation. Currently, there is no freely available desktop application that enables users to rapidly visualise comparisons between hundreds of draft or complete genomes in a single image.
resultsBLAST Ring Image Generator (BRIG) can generate images that show multiple prokaryote genome comparisons, without an arbitrary limit on the number of genomes compared. The output image shows similarity between a central reference sequence and other sequences as a set of concentric rings, where BLAST matches are coloured on a sliding scale indicating a defined percentage identity. Images can also include draft genome assembly information to show read coverage, assembly breakpoints and collapsed repeats. In addition, BRIG supports the mapping of unassembled sequencing reads against one or more central reference sequences. Many types of custom data and annotations can be shown using BRIG, making it a versatile approach for visualising a range of genomic comparison data. BRIG is readily accessible to any user, as it assumes no specialist computational knowledge and will perform all required file parsing and BLAST comparisons automatically.
conclusionsThere is a clear need for a user-friendly program that can produce genome comparisons for a large number of prokaryote genomes with an emphasis on rapidly utilising unfinished or unassembled genome data. Here we present BRIG, a cross-platform application that enables the interactive generation of comparative genomic images via a simple graphical-user interface. BRIG is freely available for all operating systems at http://sourceforge.net/projects/brig/.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.