Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21824423›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2011

BLAST Ring Image Generator (BRIG): simple prokaryote genome comparisons.

Nabil-Fareed Alikhan, Nicola K Petty, Nouri L Ben Zakour, Scott A Beatson

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2,013 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2,013citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2,013 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. ZoonoticEmerging microbes & infections · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Global spread of carbapenem-resistantOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2026
    Article
  9. Genomic characterization ofOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2026
    Article
  10. Dual resistance to carbapenems and colistin inEmerging microbes & infections · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. ISAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Genomic characterization ofMicrobiology (Reading, England) · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Transferable IncHI2-AssociatedFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

1,953 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nabil-Fareed AlikhanAustralian Infectious Diseases Research Centre, School of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia.
Nicola K Petty
Nouri L Ben Zakour
Scott A Beatson

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVisualisation of genome comparisons is invaluable for helping to determine genotypic differences between closely related prokaryotes. New visualisation and abstraction methods are required in order to improve the validation, interpretation and communication of genome sequence information; especially with the increasing amount of data arising from next-generation sequencing projects. Visualising a prokaryote genome as a circular image has become a powerful means of displaying informative comparisons of one genome to a number of others. Several programs, imaging libraries and internet resources already exist for this purpose, however, most are either limited in the number of comparisons they can show, are unable to adequately utilise draft genome sequence data, or require a knowledge of command-line scripting for implementation. Currently, there is no freely available desktop application that enables users to rapidly visualise comparisons between hundreds of draft or complete genomes in a single image.

resultsBLAST Ring Image Generator (BRIG) can generate images that show multiple prokaryote genome comparisons, without an arbitrary limit on the number of genomes compared. The output image shows similarity between a central reference sequence and other sequences as a set of concentric rings, where BLAST matches are coloured on a sliding scale indicating a defined percentage identity. Images can also include draft genome assembly information to show read coverage, assembly breakpoints and collapsed repeats. In addition, BRIG supports the mapping of unassembled sequencing reads against one or more central reference sequences. Many types of custom data and annotations can be shown using BRIG, making it a versatile approach for visualising a range of genomic comparison data. BRIG is readily accessible to any user, as it assumes no specialist computational knowledge and will perform all required file parsing and BLAST comparisons automatically.

conclusionsThere is a clear need for a user-friendly program that can produce genome comparisons for a large number of prokaryote genomes with an emphasis on rapidly utilising unfinished or unassembled genome data. Here we present BRIG, a cross-platform application that enables the interactive generation of comparative genomic images via a simple graphical-user interface. BRIG is freely available for all operating systems at http://sourceforge.net/projects/brig/.

Indexed as

Computer GraphicsSoftwareGenome, ArchaealGenome, BacterialGenomicsUser-Computer Interface

Identifiers

PMID21824423
PMCPMC3163573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.