ArticleCritical care (London, England)2011
Managing daily intensive care activities: an observational study concerning ad hoc decision making of charge nurses and intensivists.
Article in Critical care (London, England), 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Registered nurses' clinical reasoning in home-based care: a retrospective think-aloud design - the DECIDE project.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2026Article
- Potentials and challenges of an integrative medicine protocol in intensive care: the perspective of intensive care nurses.BMC complementary medicine and therapies · 2026Article
- Stop asking if AI will replace ICU doctors! Start asking how it will radically transform their practice.Intensive care medicine · 2025Article
- The limitations of evidence-based medicine compel the practice of personalized medicine.Intensive care medicine · 2024Article
- Enhancing post-arrest prognostication through good outcome prediction.Resuscitation · 2024Article
- Association of Sociodemographic Factors With Overtriage, Undertriage, and Value of Care After Major Surgery.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2024Article
- Newly qualified intensive care nurses' lived experiences of being a shift leader in a private healthcare institution in Gauteng, South Africa.International journal of nursing sciences · 2023Article
- Artificial Intelligence and Surgical Decision-making.JAMA surgery · 2020Review
- [Are the initial pH and the lactate values after cardiopulmonary resuscitation always crucial?]Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2019Article
- The effect of nursing participation in the design of a critical care information system: a case study in a Chinese hospital.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2017Article
- An Observational Study of Decision Making by Medical Intensivists.Critical care medicine · 2015Observational
- An Integrative Literature Review of Organisational Factors Associated with Admission and Discharge Delays in Critical Care.BioMed research international · 2015Review
- Burnout in intensive care units - a consideration of the possible prevalence and frequency of new risk factors: a descriptive correlational multicentre study.BMC anesthesiology · 2013Article
- National survey focusing on the crucial information needs of intensive care charge nurses and intensivists: same goal, different demands.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2013Article
- Year in review 2011: Critical Care--Resource management.Critical care (London, England) · 2012Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionManagement of daily activities in ICUs is challenging. ICU shift leaders, charge nurses and intensivists have to make several immediate ad hoc decisions to enable the fluent flow of ICU activities. Even though the management of ICU activities is quite well delineated by international consensus guidelines, we know only a little about the content of the real clinical decision making of ICU shift leaders.
methodsWe conducted an observational study with the think-aloud technique to describe the ad hoc decision making of ICU shift leaders. The study was performed in two university-affiliated hospital ICUs. Twelve charge nurses and eight intensivists were recruited. Observations were recorded and transcribed for qualitative content analysis using the protocol analysis method. The software program NVivo 7 was used to manage the data. The interrater agreement was assessed with percentages and by Cohen's κ.
resultsWe identified 463 ad hoc decisions made by the charge nurses and 444 made by the intensivists. During our data collection time, this breaks down to over 230 immediately made decisions per day (24 hours). We divided the ad hoc decision making of ICU shift leaders into two types: process-focused and situation-focused. Process-focused decision making included more permanent information, such as human resources, know-how and material resources, whereas situation-focused decision making included decisions about single events, such as patient admission. We named eight different categories for ICU ad hoc decision making: (1) adverse events, (2) diagnostics, (3) human resources and know-how, (4) material resources, (5) patient admission, (6) patient discharge, (7) patient information and vital signs and (8) special treatments.
conclusionsICU shift leaders make a great number of complex ad hoc decisions throughout the day. Often this decision making involves both intensivists and charge nurses. It forms a bundle that requires versatile, immediate information for a successful outcome. In the future, we need to investigate which information is crucial for ad hoc decision making. These challenges should also be emphasised when information technology programs for ICU care management are developed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.